Development of an Equipment Failure Identification Expert System with Multiple Reasoning Approaches

Yeong Ho Ho; Huei Sen Wang; Hei Chia Wang

doi:10.4028/www.scientific.net/AMM.479-480.1001

Paper Titles

Threshold-Based Privacy-Preserving Key Management Scheme for Vehicle-to-Grid Networks
p.978

Robust Exponential Stability for Uncertain Discrete-Time Switched Systems with Interval Time-Varying Delay via a Switching Signal
p.983

The Hybrid Differential Evolution with Dynamic Scaling Mutation and Wrapper Local Search for Optimization Problems
p.989

Implementation and Experiments of TDOA Monitoring Techniques for Broadcasting Interferences
p.996

Development of an Equipment Failure Identification Expert System with Multiple Reasoning Approaches
p.1001

Classification of Chinese Popular Songs Using a Fusion Scheme of GMM Model Estimate and Formant Feature Analysis
p.1006

Low Phase Noise and Low Power Voltage-Controlled-Oscillator Using Current-Reuse Techniques for Wireless Communication Circuits
p.1010

Design of 3.1-10.6GHz CMOS LNA Based on Input Matching Technique of Common-Gate Topology
p.1014

A Source Routing Protocol for Bluetooth-Based Sensor Networks
p.1018

HomeApplied Mechanics and MaterialsApplied Mechanics and Materials Vols. 479-480Development of an Equipment Failure Identification...

Development of an Equipment Failure Identification Expert System with Multiple Reasoning Approaches

Abstract:

The goal of the reasoning system in this study is to identify the most similar failure type or failure cases. As a user inputs all possible requirements (attributes), the inference engine of the system carries out its similarity assessment (inference approaches) and ranks rules or cases from the data base. Various inference approaches are chosen to find out the optimal method for the RBR and CBR system. The CBR system offers two types of inference methods which are hierarchical factors, flat factors without weight. For RBR system, there three types of inference methods are chosen, one is complete matched and the others are partial matched approaches which use the inference capability of CBR. The performance of developed system is then evaluated by using the real cases from China Steel Corporation (CSC). For the RBR system, performance is directly check the inferred order of the document ranking list. For the CBR system, the effectiveness of each inference method is evaluated by using Recall, Precision, and F-Measure approaches. From the test results, many recommendations are proposed.