Study on Desert Ecological Resources in Green Environment

Article Preview

Abstract:

Desert ecological tourism resources in green environment are an integration of desert natural geographic and landform landscape with its interdependent desert ecosystem environment, possess two major functions, and also their values are reflected in ecological benefit and recreation value. Therefore, through choosing ecological tourism as an index and combining EM inside direct cost and outside direct cost with grading evaluation, the intension of the recreation value of desert tourism resources in green environment was defined according to the ecological tourism function of desert tourism resources; through investigation and research, classification, data collection and regression processing, the recreation value of China's desert tourism resources was calculated, and the result showed that the recreation value of China's desert tourism resources in green environment reached 4.5 billion RMB in 2010.

You might also be interested in these eBooks

Info:

Periodical:

Pages:

475-478

Citation:

Online since:

January 2014

Export:

Price:

Permissions CCC:

Permissions PLS:

Сopyright:

© 2014 Trans Tech Publications Ltd. All Rights Reserved

Share:

Citation:

[1] Tobias. D., & Mendelsohn, R (1991) Valuing Ecotourism in a Tropical Rain Forest Reserve. Ambo 1(2): 91-93.

Google Scholar

[2] Menthes, S., & Lobber, D. J (1996) International Ecotourism and the Valuation of Tropical Rainforests in Costa Rica. Journal of Environmental Management 2(1): 1-10.

Google Scholar

[3] Tisdell, C., & Wen, J. (1997). Total Economic Evaluation of Protected Areas. Annals of Tourism Research 3(4): 992-994.

DOI: 10.1016/s0160-7383(97)00042-x

Google Scholar

[4] Lee, C. -K., Lee, J -L., & Han, S. -Y (2000) Measuring the Economic Value of Ecotourism Resources: The Case of South Korea. Journal of Travel Research 4(6): 40-46.

DOI: 10.1177/004728759803600405

Google Scholar

[5] Freeman(1993) M the Measurement of Environmental and Resources Value: Theory and Methods Washington, RFF 5(6): 957-959.

Google Scholar

[6] Krutilla J V (1998) Conservation Reconsidered Smith V K. Environmental Resources and Applied Welfare Economics: Cusses in Honor of John V. Drusilla Washington RFF 6(7): 263-273.

Google Scholar

[7] Wilman E A (1980) The Value of Time in Recreation Benefits Studies Journal Environmental Economics and Management 7(6): 277-283.

Google Scholar

[8] McConnell K E, Standard I E (1981) Measuring the Cost of Time in Recreation Demand Analysis American Journal of Agricultural Economics 8(9): 6514-6516.

Google Scholar

[9] Smith V K, Desvousages WH, McGivney M P(1983) The Opportunity Cost of Time in Recreation Demand Model Land Economics 9(5): 314-318.

Google Scholar

[10] Backstage N E, Strand I E, Hahnemann W H(1987) Time and the Recreation Demand Model American Journal of Agricultural Economics 10(5): 293-302.

Google Scholar

[11] Rakish Palatal, Gijon Anna Geevarghese, Ram Badu P, et al (1999) Valuation of Landmass Degradation Using Fuzzy Hedonic Method: A Case Study of National Capital Region Environment and Resource Economics 11(4): 519-543.

Google Scholar

[12] Smith V K(1997) Time and the Valuation of Environmental Resources (Discussion paper 98-107) Washington: RFF 12(4): 122-125.

Google Scholar

[13] Tyrvainen L, Vaananen H (1998) The Economic Value of Urban Forest Amenities: An Application of Contingent Valuation Method Landscape and Urban Planning 3(5): 557-569.

DOI: 10.1016/s0169-2046(98)00103-0

Google Scholar

[14] Randall A (1998) Beyond the Crucial Experiment: Mapping the Performance Characteristics of Contingent Valuation Resource and Energy Economics 14(4): 197-206.

DOI: 10.1016/s0928-7655(97)00036-5

Google Scholar

[15] Gan J, Miller J H, Hargrove T M, et al (1998) Effects of Site Preparation on Timber and Non-Timber Values of Loblolly Pine Plantations Forest Ecology and Management 15(6): 47-53.

DOI: 10.1016/s0378-1127(97)00321-6

Google Scholar

[16] Schulze W D, Mcglelland G H, Lazo J K, et al (1998) Embedding and Calibration in Measuring Non-use Values Resource and Energy Economics 16(7): 163-178.

DOI: 10.1016/s0928-7655(97)00034-1

Google Scholar

[17] Green D, Jacowitz K E, Kahneman D, et al(1998) Referendum Contingent Valuation, Anchoring, and Willing to Pay for Public Goods 17(6): 942-946.

DOI: 10.1016/s0928-7655(97)00031-6

Google Scholar

[18] Blomquist G C, Whitehead J C (1998) Resource Quality Information and Validity of Willingness to Pay in Contingent Resource and Energy Economics 8(9): 514-516.

DOI: 10.1016/s0928-7655(97)00035-3

Google Scholar

[19] Jianqiang Zheng, Sen Li, Yaoli Huang (2003) Study on the Significance and Tactics of the Exploitation of Desert-tourism Resources in Western Development Areal Research and Development 19(5): 1314-1318.

Google Scholar

[20] William E. ham mitt, David N. Cole (2011) Recreation Ecology Beijing: Science Ecology 20(6): 757-759.

Google Scholar

[21] Li Ding, Jiang Jing (2012) Global green new deal and Chinese green economy based on environment and energy materials. Applied Mechanics and Materials 485: 494-501.

DOI: 10.4028/www.scientific.net/amr.485.494

Google Scholar

[22] Kuo Chil-Chyuan Lin Zhiyang, Tsai Wanglin (2012) A new environment friendly process for making green epoxy-based composites mold. Advanced Materials Research 341: 194-198.

DOI: 10.4028/www.scientific.net/amr.341-342.194

Google Scholar