Fatigue Research on Excavator Boom Driven by Real Loads

Article Preview

Abstract:

The difficulty to simulate the complex loads in the fatigue analysis of excavator working device results in great error in the result, so a research method of fatigue life of working device that was completely driven by real loads was proposed. With a 20t excavator as the research object, a kinetic model of excavator working device was established using the D-H method. According to the hydraulic cylinders pressure and displacement data in the process of digging recorded by the sensors, the real working loads of booms hinge points were obtained combining the equation of forces. The life contour of boom was obtained by the fatigue analysis of boom using software MSC.Fatigue. The minimum fatigue life is 16.8 years, and the result of the study provides basis for designing excavator working device structure.

You might also be interested in these eBooks

Info:

Periodical:

Pages:

1057-1060

Citation:

Online since:

January 2014

Export:

Price:

Permissions CCC:

Permissions PLS:

Сopyright:

© 2014 Trans Tech Publications Ltd. All Rights Reserved

Share:

Citation:

* - Corresponding Author

[1] Rui Bai. Finite Element Analysis and Fatigue Life Prediction of Hydraulic Excavator Working Device[D]. Taiyuan: Taiyuan University of Technology, (2011).

Google Scholar

[2] Weixin Yao. Fatigue life analysis of structure [M]. Beijing: National defense industry press, (2003).

Google Scholar

[3] Weiguo Zhang, Long Quan. Fatigue analysis on working device of excavator driven by practical load[J]. Journal of agricultural machinery, 2011, 42(5): 35-38.

Google Scholar

[4] Haifeng Song, Huanmin Xu. Kinematical analysis of the excavator working device based on D-H methodology[J]. Construction machinery, 2012(17): 87-90.

Google Scholar

[5] Xiangfeng Ma. Robot mechanisms [M]. Beijing: China Machine Press, (1991).

Google Scholar

[6] Bo Li, Jun Yan. Kinematics modeling and analysis of excavator working device[J]. Journal of machine design, 2011, 28(10): 7-10.

Google Scholar