Variable Scale Compressive Tracking Based on Structural Constraint Sample

Article Preview

Abstract:

A variable scale compressive tracking algorithm based on structural constraint sample is presented to solve the variable scale problem in this paper. A number of scanning windows with different scales and positions are obtained by structural constraint sampling.Some sparse random sensing matrices with different scales that can be computed offline easily are adopted to extract the features of different foreground target and background sample image patches with relevant scales online, the sample patch having a maximal score is regarded as the new tracking result by classifying the compressive features via a naive bayesian classifier,meanwhile,to update the location and scale. Experimental results show the proposed algorithm performs favorably against state-of-the-art algorithms on challenging sequences in terms of the basic attitude and scale change, which is robust and does not depend on the scale selection of the initial tracking area.

You might also be interested in these eBooks

Info:

Periodical:

Pages:

1074-1078

Citation:

Online since:

January 2014

Export:

Price:

Permissions CCC:

Permissions PLS:

Сopyright:

© 2014 Trans Tech Publications Ltd. All Rights Reserved

Share:

Citation:

* - Corresponding Author

[1] Mei X, Ling H. Robust visual tracking and vehicle classification via sparse representation[J]. IEEE Transactions on Pattern Analysis and Machine Intelligence, 2011, 33(4): 1619-1632.

DOI: 10.1109/tpami.2011.66

Google Scholar

[2] Grabner H, Grabner M, Bischof. Real-time tracking via online boosting[C]/ Proceedings of British Machine Vision Conference, 2006: 47-56.

DOI: 10.5244/c.20.6

Google Scholar

[3] Kalal Z, Matas J, Mikolajczyk K. P-N learning: boostrapping binary classifier by structural constranits[C]/ Proceedings of International Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition, 2010: 49-56.

DOI: 10.1109/cvpr.2010.5540231

Google Scholar

[4] Zhang Kai-hua, Zhang Lei, Ming-Hsuan Y. Real Time compressive tracking[C]/ Proceedings of European Conference on Computer Vision, PartIII, 2012: 866-879.

Google Scholar

[5] Candes E, Tao T. Decoding by linear programing[J]. IEEE Trans. Inform. Theory, 2005, 51(3): 4203-4215.

DOI: 10.1109/tit.2005.858979

Google Scholar

[6] Achlioptas D. Database-friendly random projections: Johnson-Lindenstrauss with binary coins[J]. Comput. Syst. Sci, 2003, 66(6): 671-687.

DOI: 10.1016/s0022-0000(03)00025-4

Google Scholar

[7] Baraniuk R, Davenport M, Devore R. A simple proof of the restricted isometry property for random matrices[J]. Constructive Approximation, 2008, 28(7): 253-263.

DOI: 10.1007/s00365-007-9003-x

Google Scholar

[8] Diaconis P, Freedman D. Asymptotics of graphical projection pursuit[J]. Annals of Applied Statistics, 1984, 12(8): 228-235.

DOI: 10.1214/aos/1176346703

Google Scholar

[9] Adam A, Rivlin E. Robust fragments-based tracking using the integral histogram [C]/ Proceedings of International Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition, 2006: 798-805.

DOI: 10.1109/cvpr.2006.256

Google Scholar

[10] Babenko B, Yang M H. Robust object tracking with online multiple instrance learning[J]. IEEE Transactions on Pattern Analysis and Machine Intelligence, 2011, 33(2): 1619-1632.

DOI: 10.1109/tpami.2010.226

Google Scholar