The Relationship between Frequency Domain Blind Source Separation and Frequency Domain Adaptive Beamformer

Article Preview

Abstract:

As two important methods of array signal processing, blind source separation and beamforming can extract the target signal and suppress interference by using the received information of the array element. In the case of convolution mixture of sources, frequency domain blind source separation and frequency domain adaptive beamforming have similar signal model. To find the relationship between them, comparison between the minimization of the off-diagonal components in the BSS update equation and the minimization of the mean square error in the ABF had been made from the perspective of mathematical expressions, and find that the unmixing matrix of the BSS and the filter coefficients of the ABF converge to the same solution in the mean square error sense under the condition that the two source signals are ideally independent. With MATLAB, the equivalence in the frequency domain have been verified and the causes affecting separation performance have been analyzed, which was achieved by simulating instantaneous and convolution mixtures and separating mixture speech in frequency-domain blind source separation and frequency domain adaptive beamforming way.

You might also be interested in these eBooks

Info:

Periodical:

Pages:

654-662

Citation:

Online since:

January 2014

Export:

Price:

Permissions CCC:

Permissions PLS:

Сopyright:

© 2014 Trans Tech Publications Ltd. All Rights Reserved

Share:

Citation:

* - Corresponding Author

[1] R. B. Wang, C. H. Hou, J. Yang: The Relationship between Blind Separation of Instantaneous Mixture of Sources and Optimum Beamforming, Applied Acoustics. Vol. 30 (4): 302-305 (2011).

Google Scholar

[2] Y. C. Wang, L. J. Chen, Wideband Blind Beamforming and Blind Separation of Convolved Mixtures. Vol. 22(1): 40-43 (2003).

Google Scholar

[3] S. Kurita, H. Saruwatari, S. Kajita, K. Takeda, et al: Evaluation of Blind Signal Separation Method using Directivity Pattern under Reverberant Conditions/Proc. ICASSP2000.: 3140-3143 (2000).

DOI: 10.1109/icassp.2000.861203

Google Scholar

[4] L. Parra and C. Alvino: Geometric Source Separation: Merging Convolutive Source Separation with Geometric Beamforming. Speech and Audio Processing, Vol 10(6): 352-362 (2001).

DOI: 10.1109/tsa.2002.803443

Google Scholar

[5] L. Parra and C. Spence: Convolutive Blind Separation of Nonstationary Sources. IEEE Trans. Speech Audio Processing, Vol. 8(3): 320-327 (2000).

DOI: 10.1109/89.841214

Google Scholar

[6] M. S. Pedersen, D. L. Wang, J. Larsen et al: Two-Microphone Separation of Speech Mixtures. IEEE transactions on neural networks, vol. 19 : 475-492 (2008).

DOI: 10.1109/tnn.2007.911740

Google Scholar

[7] R. Prasad, H. Saruwatari, A. Lee et al: A Fixed Point ICA Algorithm for Convoluted Speech Separation. Proc. International Symposium on ICA&BSS, Vol. 23(4): 579-584 (2003).

Google Scholar

[8] Rajkishore Prasad, Hiroshi Saruwatari and Kiyohiro Shikano: Blind Separation of Speech by Fixed-point ICA with Source Adaptive Negentropy Approximation. IEICE Transactions on Fundamentals of Electronics, Communications and Computer Sciences, E88-A(7): 1683-1692 (2005).

DOI: 10.1093/ietfec/e88-a.7.1683

Google Scholar

[9] O. L. Frost: An Algorithm for Linearly Constrained Adaptive Array Processing. Proc. IEEE, Vol. 60(8): 926-935 (1972).

DOI: 10.1109/proc.1972.8817

Google Scholar

[10] M. S. Brandstein and D. B. Ward: Microphone Arrays/Digital Signal Processing. New York: Springer-Verlag, (2001).

Google Scholar