Finite Element Analysis of Material Mechanics Experiment

Article Preview

Abstract:

The finite element analysis is used for general experimental mechanics of materials. By analyzing numerical value of finite element in ANSYS software platforms, the corresponding stress, strain data and deformation diagram will be obtained. This lays a foundation for academic research of experiment. This paper compares the conventional electric method with finite element analysis by the normal-stress distribution of pure bending beams experiment. The comparing shows that the experimental results of the two methods are uniformity. In this paper, the study provides an effective way to experimental mechanics of innovative research.

You might also be interested in these eBooks

Info:

Periodical:

Pages:

277-280

Citation:

Online since:

February 2014

Export:

Price:

Permissions CCC:

Permissions PLS:

Сopyright:

© 2014 Trans Tech Publications Ltd. All Rights Reserved

Share:

Citation:

* - Corresponding Author

[1] Sun Hongjun, Zhao Lihong. Research and exploration of the teaching experiment of material mechanics [J]. Journal of Liaoning University of Technology (SOCIAL SCIENCE EDITION), 2010, 12 (4): 139-140.

Google Scholar

[2] Gangnian Qin, Liao Qingmin, Meng Yanjiu. Creative talents training and research and exploration, the construction of [J]. laboratory experiment teaching demonstration center, 2010, 29 (9): 116-118, 121.

Google Scholar

[3] Gao Yonghui, Yang Kai. Study on [J]. material mechanics teaching system of Shanxi architecture, 2010, 36 (8): 223-224.

Google Scholar

[4] Chai Weiss, Xie Ling. A new experimental teaching mode [J]. mechanics and practice, institutions of higher learning of mechanics of materials, 2008, 30 (5): 101-102.

Google Scholar

[5] Liu Hongwen, Lv Rongkun experimental mechanics of materials [M] Beijing: Higher Education Press, 2006, 70-80.

Google Scholar

[6] summer Qihan. Testing principle of the strain gauge and its application in engineering [J]. Shanxi architecture, 2008, 34 (28): 99-100.

Google Scholar