Comparison of the Geometric Accuracy by DSIF Toolpath with SPIF Toolpath

Jin Han Wu; Qiu Cheng Wang

doi:10.4028/www.scientific.net/AMM.494-495.497

Paper Titles

The Statics Analysis of the Lathe Tool Based on Workbench
p.478

An FTPBM Model for Conceptual Design of Mechanical Execution System
p.482

Study on Compacting Mechanism of Plate Cross Wedge Rolling High-Speed Rail Screw Spike
p.486

Recent Study on the Passive and Active Vibration Isolators
p.491

Comparison of the Geometric Accuracy by DSIF Toolpath with SPIF Toolpath
p.497

Numerical Simulation in the Effect of Ignition Mode and Position on Fragment Velocity of Azimuthal Warhead
p.502

Study on the Deformation Resistance of Tension-Reduction Process of Steel Pipe
p.506

The Component Utilization Analysis of Mechanical System with Adaptable Functions
p.510

Stress Intensity Factor Solutions of Integral Stiffened Panels Based on an Improved Displacement Compatibility Method
p.514

HomeApplied Mechanics and MaterialsApplied Mechanics and Materials Vols. 494-495Comparison of the Geometric Accuracy by DSIF...

Comparison of the Geometric Accuracy by DSIF Toolpath with SPIF Toolpath

Abstract:

As there is no sufficient support between the single moving tool and fixture, the formed metal sheet is easy to bend in single point incremental forming (SPIF). Double sided incremental forming (DSIF) is proposed in which two tools are used on each side of the sheet to improve the components forming accuracy. Element finite method is introduced to simulate the forming process with both DSIF and SPIF toolpaths and the component geometric accuracies are compared. The simulation result shows the DSIF toolpaths can obtain better geometric accuracy than SPIF.

You might also be interested in these eBooks

Current Development of Mechanical Engineering and Energy

View Preview

Info:

Periodical:

Applied Mechanics and Materials (Volumes 494-495)

Pages:

497-501

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.4028/www.scientific.net/AMM.494-495.497

Citation:

Cite this paper

Online since:

February 2014

Authors:

Jin Han Wu*, Qiu Cheng Wang

Keywords:

DSIF, Finite Element Method (FEM), Geometric Accuracy, Toolpath

Export:

RIS, BibTeX

Price:

Permissions CCC:

Request Permissions

Permissions PLS:

Request Permissions

Сopyright:

Citation:

* - Corresponding Author

References

[1] Rajiv Malhotra, Jian Cao, Feng Ren. Improvement of Geometric Accuracy in Incremental Forming by Using a Squeezing Toolpath Strategy with Two Forming Tools [J]. Journal of Manufacturing Science and Engineering, Vol. 133 (2011), 061019-1-061019-10.

DOI: 10.1115/msec2011-50262

Google Scholar

[2] H. Meier, C. Magnus, V. Smukala. Impact of Superimposed Pressure on Dieless Incremental Sheet Metal Forming with Two Moving Tools [J]. CIRP Annals-Manufacturing Technology, Vol. 60 (2011), 327-330.

DOI: 10.1016/j.cirp.2011.03.134

Google Scholar

[3] P.A.F. Martins, N. Bay. Theory of Single Point Incremental Forming [J]. CIRP Annals-Manufacturing Technology, Vol. 57 (2008), 247-252.

DOI: 10.1016/j.cirp.2008.03.047

Google Scholar

[4] M. B. Silva, P.A.F. Martions. Two-Point Incremental Forming with Partial Die: Theory and Experimentation [J]. Journal of Materials Engineering and Performance, Vol. 22 (2013), 1018-1027.

DOI: 10.1007/s11665-012-0400-3

Google Scholar

[5] Rajiv Malhotra, Jian Cao, Michael Beltran, Dongkai Xu. Accumulative-DSIF Strategy for Enhancing Process Capabilities in Incremental Forming [J]. CIRP Annals—Manufacturing Technology, Vol. 61 (2012), 251-254.

DOI: 10.1016/j.cirp.2012.03.093

Google Scholar