Empirical Analysis on Time to Collision at Urban Expressway

Article Preview

Abstract:

Traffic safety is of great significance, especially at urban expressway where traffic volume is large and traffic conflicts are highlighted. But little research up to date has discussed in detail how these factors impact the TTC characteristics. In this paper, field Beijing expressway data were collected by video with different locations, lanes, traffic conditions and following vehicle types. Accordingly, some basic descriptive statistics of total TTC samples were shown and analyzed. We then used T-test to analyze the effect of road environments, traffic conditions, and vehicle types on TTC statistically. The results implied three main findings. Firstly, TTC was found to change according to road environments (i.e. TTC on weaving segment is smaller than other locations), secondly, some evidence supported this hypothesis that traffic conditions (especially uncongested traffic condition) affect TTC significantly, and lastly, little correlation was found between TTC means and vehicle types.

You might also be interested in these eBooks

Info:

Periodical:

Pages:

1127-1132

Citation:

Online since:

January 2014

Export:

Price:

Permissions CCC:

Permissions PLS:

Сopyright:

© 2014 Trans Tech Publications Ltd. All Rights Reserved

Share:

Citation:

* - Corresponding Author

[1] A. Svensson, A method for analyzing the traffic process in a safety perspective. Doctoral Dissertation, University of Lund, 1998, Lund, Sweden.

Google Scholar

[2] P.G. Michael, F.C. Leeming, and W.O. Dwyer: Transportation Research Part F Vol. 3 (2000), p.55.

Google Scholar

[3] K. Vogel: Accident Analysis and Prevention Vol. 35 (2003), p.427.

Google Scholar

[4] H. Farah, S. Bekhor, and A. Polus: Accident Analysis and Prevention Vol. 41 (2009), p.887.

Google Scholar

[5] W.H. Janssen, and L. Nilsson. In: International Symposium on Automotive Technology and Automation, (1991).

Google Scholar

[6] W. Van Winsum, and A. Heino: Ergonomics Vol. 39 (1996), p.579.

Google Scholar

[7] S. Jin, X. Qu, and D. Wang: International Journal of Computational Intelligence Systems Vol. 4 (2011), p.1122.

Google Scholar

[8] Q. Meng, X. Qu, X. Wang, V. Yuanita, and S.C. Wong: Risk Analysis Vol. 31 (2011), p.382.

Google Scholar

[9] Q. Meng, X. Qu, K.T. Yong, and Y.H. Wong: Risk Analysis Vol. 31 (2011), p.1872.

Google Scholar

[10] Q. Meng, and X. Qu: Accident Analysis and Prevention Vol. 48 (2012), p.254.

Google Scholar

[11] X. Qu, Q. Meng, V. Yuanita, and Y.H. Wong: Expert Systems with Applications Vol. 38 (2011), p.13827.

Google Scholar

[12] S. Jin, D. Wang, C. Xu, and D. Ma: Journal of Zhejiang University SCIENCE A Vol. 14 (2013) p.231.

Google Scholar

[13] D.N. Lee: Perception Vol. 5 (1976), p.437.

Google Scholar

[14] W. Van Winsum and A. Heino: Ergonomics Vol. 39 (1996), p.579.

Google Scholar

[15] S. Jin, D. Wang, P. Tao, and P. Li: Physica A Vol. 389 (2010), p.4654.

Google Scholar

[16] S. Jin, Z. Huang, P. Tao, and D. Wang: Journal of Zhejiang University-SCIENCE A Vol. 12 (2011), p.1.

Google Scholar

[17] S. Jin, D. Wang, C. Xu, and Z. Huang: Physics Letters A Vol. 376 (2012), p.153.

Google Scholar

[18] S. Jin, D. Wang, Z. Huang, and P. Tao: Physica A Vol. 390 (2011), p. (1931).

Google Scholar