Anticipation Driving Behavior in Car Following Theory

Article Preview

Abstract:

In this paper, a new anticipation driving car-following model (AD-TVDM) is presented based on the two velocity difference model (TVDM)[1], taking into the effect of anticipation driving behavior in real world. The nature of the model is investigated by using linear and nonlinear analysis method. A thermodynamic theory is formulated to describe the phase transition and critical phenomenon in traffic flow and the time-dependent Ginzburg-Landau (TDGL) equation is derived to describe the traffic flow near the critical point.

You might also be interested in these eBooks

Info:

Periodical:

Pages:

1133-1136

Citation:

Online since:

January 2014

Export:

Price:

Permissions CCC:

Permissions PLS:

Сopyright:

© 2014 Trans Tech Publications Ltd. All Rights Reserved

Share:

Citation:

* - Corresponding Author

[1] H.X. Ge, R.J. Cheng and Z.P. Li: Two velocity difference model for a car following theory. Phys. A, 387 5239 (2008).

Google Scholar

[2] D. Helbing, B. Tilch: Generalized force model of traffic dynamics. Phys. Rev. E, 58, 133(1998).

DOI: 10.1103/physreve.58.133

Google Scholar

[3] R. Jiang, Q.S. Wu and Z.J. Zhu: Full velocity difference model for a car-following theory. Phys. Rev. E, 64, 017101(2001).

Google Scholar

[4] M. Bando, K. Hasebe, A. Nakayama, A. Shibata and Y. Sugiyama: Dynamical model of traffic congestion and numerical simulation. Phys. Rev. E, 51, 1035(1995).

DOI: 10.1103/physreve.51.1035

Google Scholar

[5] T. Nagatani: TDGL and MKDV equations for jamming transiton in the lattice models of traffic. Phys. A, 264, 581 (1999).

DOI: 10.1016/s0378-4371(98)00466-x

Google Scholar

[6] T.Q. Tang, H.J. Huang and H.Y. Shang: A new macro model for traffic flow with the consideration of the driver's forecast effect. Phys. Lett. A, 374, 1668-1672(2010).

DOI: 10.1016/j.physleta.2010.02.001

Google Scholar

[7] Y.R. Kang, D.H. Sun: Lattice hydrodynamic traffic flow model with explicit driver's physical delay. Nonlinear Dynamics, 71, 531(2013).

DOI: 10.1007/s11071-012-0679-5

Google Scholar