Comparison of LLE and PCA Algorithms for Gene Expression Data Analysis

Article Preview

Abstract:

According to the problem that the linear dimension reduction is not effective to understand gene expression data. using the manifold learning as a guide, analysing dimensionality reduction of gene expression data, selecting colon cancer and leukaemia gene expression datasets for investigation, using inter category distances as the criteria to quantitatively evaluate the effects of data dimensionality reduction. Experiments show that LLE algorithm is more suitable method for the gene expression data. The LLE analyses indicate that there is a clear distinction boundary between the healthy people and the cancer patients.

You might also be interested in these eBooks

Info:

Periodical:

Pages:

378-381

Citation:

Online since:

February 2014

Export:

Price:

Permissions CCC:

Permissions PLS:

Сopyright:

© 2014 Trans Tech Publications Ltd. All Rights Reserved

Share:

Citation:

* - Corresponding Author

[1] Miller LD, Long PM, Wong L, et al. Optimal gene expression analysis by microarrays [J], Cancer Cell 2: 353, (2002).

Google Scholar

[2] Bhattacharjee A, Richards WG, Staunton J, et al. Classification of human lung carcinomas by mRNA expression profiling reveals distinct adenocarcinoma subclasses [J], Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA, 98: 13790–13795, (2001).

DOI: 10.1073/pnas.191502998

Google Scholar

[3] Gorban AN, Zinovyev A. Principal manifolds and graphs in practice: from molecular biology to dynamical systems, International Journal of Neural Systems, 3: 219–232, (2010).

DOI: 10.1142/s0129065710002383

Google Scholar

[4] Tenenbaum JB, de Silva V and Langford JC. A global geometric framework for nonlinear dimensionality reduction, Science, 290: 2319–2323, (2000).

DOI: 10.1126/science.290.5500.2319

Google Scholar

[5] Lee JA, Verleysen M, Nonlinear Dimensionality Reduction, Springer, (2007).

Google Scholar

[6] Hotelling H. Analysis of a complex of statistical variables into principal components, Journal of Educational Psychology, 24: 417–441, (1933).

DOI: 10.1037/h0071325

Google Scholar

[7] Coifman RR, Lafon S, Lee AB, et al. Geometric diffusions as a tool for harmonic analysis and structure definition of data: multiscale methods, Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA, 102: 7432–7437, (2005).

DOI: 10.1073/pnas.0500896102

Google Scholar

[8] Roweis ST, Saul LK. Nonlinear dimensionality reduction by locally linear embedding, Science, 290: 2323–2326, (2000).

DOI: 10.1126/science.290.5500.2323

Google Scholar

[9] Jenkins OC, Mataric MJ. Deriving action and behavior primitives from human motion data, In Proc. IEEE Int Conf. on Intelligent Robots and Systems, p.2551–2556, (2002).

DOI: 10.1109/irds.2002.1041654

Google Scholar

[10] Niskanen M, Silvén O. Comparison of dimensionality reduction methods for wood surface inspection, In Proc. 6th International Conf. on Quality Control by Artificial Vision, p.178–187, (2003).

DOI: 10.1117/12.514959

Google Scholar

[11] Alon, U., Barkai, N., Notterman, D.A., et al. Broad patterns of gene expression revealed by clustering analysis of tumor and normal colon tissues probed by oligonucleotide arrays. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA, 96: 6745-6750, (1999).

DOI: 10.1073/pnas.96.12.6745

Google Scholar