Comparing Study on Approaches of Identifying Indicators' Benchmark for Sustainable Development

Article Preview

Abstract:

Based on literature study, three principles of identifying benchmark were formulated, and four general approaches of benchmark recognition were summarized. We adopted Beijing sustainable development indicators as a sample to test each approach, with which we could compare the results and analyze the characteristics, advantages, disadvantages as well as suitability. The research results showed that indicators with different characters should be treated with different approaches for benchmark identification.

You might also be interested in these eBooks

Info:

Periodical:

Pages:

3874-3877

Citation:

Online since:

February 2014

Export:

Price:

Permissions CCC:

Permissions PLS:

Сopyright:

© 2014 Trans Tech Publications Ltd. All Rights Reserved

Share:

Citation:

* - Corresponding Author

[1] Xu Wei, Luo Shuxiang, Xu Chenhui and Li Junling: Architecture Technology Vol. 41 (2010), pp.403-405.

Google Scholar

[2] Kim J, Kumar S, Liu C, Zhong H, Pradhan D, Shah M, Cattaneo R, Yechieli R, Robbins JR, Elshaikh MA and Chetty IJ: Physics In Medicine And Biology Vol. 58 (2013), pp.8077-97.

DOI: 10.1088/0031-9155/58/22/8077

Google Scholar

[3] Lim KY and Jiang SC: Water Research Vol. 47 (2013), pp.7273-86.

Google Scholar

[4] Yu Yongjun and Lu Yuqi: Economic Geography Vol. 21 (2001), pp.527-531.

Google Scholar

[5] Shao Anzhao: Economic Survey Vol. 3 (2003), pp.55-58.

Google Scholar

[6] Xiong Yanyan and Wu Xianqiu: Physical Experiment of College Vol. 23 (2010), pp.66-68.

Google Scholar