Power Transmission and Transformation Project Establishing and Decision-Making Based on ASU-MOPSO Algorithm

Article Preview

Abstract:

This paper demonstrates an asynchronous-stepwise updated strategy multi-objective particle swarm optimization (ASU-MOPSO) algorithm to improve the convergence and diversity of the multi-objective particle swarm optimization. In the process of the elite reduction, we utilize the asynchronous grid strategy to filter particles since this strategy has lower computing complexity. Meanwhile, the stepwised Euclidean crowding distance strategy is presented to filter particles within every grid, which uses the sum of the Euclidean distance with the two nearest particles to replace of the traditional crowding distance. This strategy can avoid the destruction of distribution diversity. Finally, our algorithm is successfully applied for the actual power transmission and transformation project establishing and decision-making problem. Comparing with traditional MOPSO based on crowding distance strategy and grid strategy, our algorithm can obtain the better solution.

You might also be interested in these eBooks

Info:

Periodical:

Pages:

521-529

Citation:

Online since:

February 2014

Export:

Price:

Permissions CCC:

Permissions PLS:

Сopyright:

© 2014 Trans Tech Publications Ltd. All Rights Reserved

Share:

Citation:

* - Corresponding Author

[1] Gong Maoguo, Jiao Licheng, Yang Dongdong, etc. Research on Evolutionary Multi-Objective Optimization Algorithms[J]. Journal of Software, 2009, 20(2): 271-289(in Chinese).

DOI: 10.3724/sp.j.1001.2009.00271

Google Scholar

[2] Goldberg DE. Genetic algorithm for search, optimization, and machine learning. Boston: Addison-Wesley Longman Publishing Co., Inc., (1989).

Google Scholar

[3] Srinivas N, Deb K. Multiobjective optimization using non-dominated sorting in genetic algorithms[J]. Evolutionary Computation, 1994, 2(3): 221-248.

DOI: 10.1162/evco.1994.2.3.221

Google Scholar

[4] Deb K, Pratap A, Agarwal S, etc. A fast and elitist multiobjectivegenetic algorithm: NSGA-II[J]. IEEE Trans on Evolutionary Computation, 2002, 6(2): 182-197.

DOI: 10.1109/4235.996017

Google Scholar

[5] Huang Ying, Li Yang, Gao Chiwei. Multi-objective transmission network planning based on non-dominated sorting differential evolution[J]. Power System Technology, 2011, 35(3): 85-89 (in Chinese).

Google Scholar

[6] Wang Xiuli, Li Shuhui, Chen Haoyong. Multi-objective and multi-district transmission planning based on NSGA-II and cooperative co-evolutionary algorithm [JProceedings of the CSEE, 2006, 26(12): 11-15 (in Chinese).

Google Scholar

[7] Tao Xinmin, Xu Peng, Liu Furong, etc. Multi-objective optimization algorithm composed of particle swarm optimization and differential evolution[J]. Computer Simulation, 2013, 30(4): 313-316(in Chinese).

Google Scholar

[8] Liu Baoning, Zhang Weiguo, Li Guangwen, etc. Improved multi-objective particle swarm optimization algorithm[J]. Journal of Beijing University of Aeronautics and Astronautics, 2013 (004): 458-462(in Chinese).

Google Scholar

[9] Liu Yanmin, Shao Zengzhen, Zhao Qingzhen. Multi-objective particle swarm optimizer based on adaptive crowding grid. Computer Science, 2011, 38(4): 260-262(in Chinese).

Google Scholar

[10] Li X. A non-dominated sorting particle swarm optimizer for multi-objective optimization. In: Cantú-Paz E, Foster JA, Deb K, Lawrence D, Roy R, eds. Proc. of the Genetic and Evolutionary Computation Conf., GECCO 2003. Berlin: Springer-Verlag, 2003. 37−48.

DOI: 10.1007/3-540-45105-6_4

Google Scholar

[11] Sierra M R, Coello C A C. Improving PSO-Based multi-objective optimization using crowding, mutation and e-dominance[C]. /Evolutionary Multi-Criterion Optimization. Springer Berlin Heidelberg, 2005: 505-519.

DOI: 10.1007/978-3-540-31880-4_35

Google Scholar

[12] Xu Heming. Research on multi-objective particle swarm optimization algorithms[D]. Shanghai Jiao Tong University, 2013(in Chinese).

Google Scholar

[13] Liu Wenying, Xie chang, Wen Jing, etc. Optimization of transmission network maintenance scheduling based on niche multi-objective particle swarm algorithm[J]. Proceedings of the CSEE, 2013, 33(004): 141-148 (in Chinese).

Google Scholar

[14] Gong Maoguo, Cheng Gang, Jiao Licheng, etc. Nondominated individual selection strategy based on adaptive partition for evolutionary multi-objective optimization[J]. Journal of Computer Research and Development, 2011, 48(4): 545-557 (in Chinese).

Google Scholar

[15] Zitzler E, Deb K, Thiele L. Comparison of multiobjective evolutionary algorithms: Empirical results[J]. Evolutionary computation, 2000, 8(2): 173-195.

DOI: 10.1162/106365600568202

Google Scholar

[16] Liu Lu, Cheng Haozhong, Ma Zeliang, etc. Multi-objective transmission expansion planning considering life cycle cost[J]. Proceedings of the CSEE, 2012, 32(022): 46-54 (in Chinese).

Google Scholar

[17] Shen Yangwu, Peng Xiaotao, Shi Tongqin, etc. A grey comprehensive method of power quality based on optimal combination weight[J]. Automation of Electric Power Systems, 2012, 36(10): 67-73 (in Chinese).

Google Scholar

[18] Luo Yi, Li Yulong. Comprehensive decision-making of transmission network planning based on entropy weight and grey relational analysis[J]. Power System Technology, 2013, 37(01): 77-81 (in Chinese).

Google Scholar