Research on the Aero Dynamicity of Steady Wing of Non-Parachute Terminal Sensitive Projectile

Article Preview

Abstract:

The stable wing of non-parachute terminal sensitive projectile (TSP) is a plate wing with two bent angles at edges of the plate wing, thus it looks like an S. Wings of this shape slow the TSP down during its falling process which provides asymmetric forces for it. Then stable scanning motion is realized. This paper established unsteady model of the S wing of the TSP based on CFD/CSD fluid structure interaction (FSI) and analyzed the aerodynamic characteristics of both rigid wing and elastic wing. The results show that the plate which bends towards the windward has the largest deformation. The drag coefficient of the elastic wing is smaller than that of rigid wing at a smaller attack angle while bigger at a larger attack angle. The displacement of S wing increases while the incoming velocity increases and has a tiny interaction relationship with attack angle.

You might also be interested in these eBooks

Info:

Periodical:

Pages:

65-68

Citation:

Online since:

February 2014

Export:

Price:

Permissions CCC:

Permissions PLS:

Сopyright:

© 2014 Trans Tech Publications Ltd. All Rights Reserved

Share:

Citation:

* - Corresponding Author

[1] Hu Zhi-Peng, Liu Rong-Zhong, Guo Rui. Effect of Two-typical Wing Shapes on Aerodynamic Characteristics of Non-parachute Terminal-sensitive Projectile. Journal of Nanjing University of Science and Technology. 36(5): 739-744. (2012).

Google Scholar

[2] Hu Zhi-Peng, Liu Rong-Zhong, Guo Rui. Aerodynamic characteristics of two wings terminal sensitive projectile based on FLUENT. FLIGHT DYNAMICS. 31(1): 53-56. (2013).

Google Scholar

[3] Guo Rui, Liu Rong-Zhong, Wang Ben-He, Hu Zhi-Peng. Experimental Study on Decelerating and Spinning Characteristics of an Asymmetric Two-wing Projectile. Journal of Projectiles, Rockets, Missiles and Guidance. 29(5): 249-254. (2009).

Google Scholar

[4] SHU Jing-Rong, JIANG Sheng-Ping, LI Ming-Jun, MA Peng-Fei. Force and Moment Analysis for Double-Win Terminal Sensing Ammunition Without Parachute at Stable Scanning Stage. Journal of Ballistics. 22(2): 48-51. (2010).

Google Scholar

[5] Shu Jing-Rong, Liu Chang-Yuan, Han Zi-Peng, Fan Yan-Fei. STUDY ON SCANNING MOTION OF FLEXIBLE SINGLE—FIN TERMINAL SENSING AMM UNITION. Journal of Ballistics. 16(1): 36-42. (2004).

Google Scholar

[6] Ramji Kamakoti, Wei Shyy, Fluid-structure interaction for aeroelastic applications. Progress in Aerospace Science, 40: 535-558. (2004).

DOI: 10.1016/j.paerosci.2005.01.001

Google Scholar

[7] Lee-Rausch E, Batina J T. Wing Flutter Computations Using an Aerodynamic Model Based on the Navier-Stokes Equations. Journal of Aircraft, 33: 1139-1147. (1996).

DOI: 10.2514/3.47068

Google Scholar

[8] Melville R B, Mortion S A, Rizzetta D P. Implementation of a fully implicit aeroelastic Navier-Stokes Solver. AIAA-1997-2039. (1997).

DOI: 10.2514/6.1997-2039

Google Scholar

[9] Jing Wu, Wang Zi-zi, Li Xian-kai. CFD/CSD-based aeroelastic analysis of large aspect ratio wing. Journal of Shenyang Aerospace University. 29(2): 23-27. (2012).

Google Scholar

[10] Lv Kun, Zhang Di, Xie Yong-Hui. Fluid-structure Interaction for Thin Plate with Different Flow Parameters. Proceedings of the CSEE. 31(26): 76-82. (2011).

Google Scholar