Study on Tube Formation Mechanism and Lateral Stiffness Testing Method of the Tubular Conveyor Belt

Article Preview

Abstract:

The tubular conveyor belt is a main part of the conveyor belt industry. The lateral stiffness value is an important parameter measuring the performance of the tubular conveyor belt. Therefore, the lateral stiffness value is an important factor to test the quality of the tubular conveyor belt. Because of the complexity in measuring the tubular conveyor belt, at present, there is no unified method to measure the lateral stiffness of a tubular belt and no unified national standard for the stiffness value, which is the criterion that domestic enterprises lack to guide their production. The paper conducts the research on testing mechanism and testing methods of stiffness value, further demonstrates them by experiments, and solves the problem of poor reproducibility and large error of the stiffness value.

You might also be interested in these eBooks

Info:

Periodical:

Pages:

351-355

Citation:

Online since:

February 2014

Export:

Price:

Permissions CCC:

Permissions PLS:

Сopyright:

© 2014 Trans Tech Publications Ltd. All Rights Reserved

Share:

Citation:

[1] Zhang WeiFeng, Wang ChuanSheng, Zhang FuXia. The Performance Analysis And Research About A Type Of New Tubular Belt [J]. Advanced Polymer Processing, III. 2013. Vol. 561(3) 235~239.

Google Scholar

[2] P. Stap Les. The history of Pipe Conveyors [J ]. Bulk Solids Handling, 2002, 22 (3): 210~213.

Google Scholar

[3] M. Hager, L. Overmeyer, F. Scholl. Investigations on Causes and Value of the Indentation Rolling Resistance of Belt Conveyors [J] bulk solids handling, 2005, 25(2): 84-91.

Google Scholar

[4] Funke H. Hartmann K. Lauhoff. H. Design and Operating Performance of a Long-Distance Belt Conveyor System with Horizontal Curves and Simultaneous. Material Transport in the Upper and Lower Strands [J]. Bulk Solids Handling, 2000, 20( 1) : 45-55.

Google Scholar

[5] Harrison A. Belt Conveyor Research 1980~2000[J]. Bulk Solids Handling, 2001, 21( 2): 159-164.

Google Scholar