Development of Catalyst for Industrial Flue Gas Denitration at Low Temperature

Article Preview

Abstract:

The most effective technology currently for flue gas denitrition is selective catalytic reduction (SCR). And the major problem against spreading SCR technology is the high cost and low efficiency of the catalyst for SCR. Al2O3 supported Mn-Fe oxide precursor was prepared through water/ethanol coprecipitation and then nitridized through NH3-TPD. Thus the inexpensive and efficient Mn-Fe-O-N/Al2O3 catalyst was obtained. The catalyst with a Mn/Al molar ratio of 0.4 and a Fe loading of 6.0 wt.% was testified to have the best performance for denitrition. The NOx conversion reached 95% at low temperature (150~200°C).

You might also be interested in these eBooks

Info:

Periodical:

Pages:

683-687

Citation:

Online since:

February 2014

Export:

Price:

Permissions CCC:

Permissions PLS:

Сopyright:

© 2014 Trans Tech Publications Ltd. All Rights Reserved

Share:

Citation:

* - Corresponding Author

[1] Wu Junbi. Research and characterization on MnOx-TiO2 for selective catalytic reduction of NOx at low temperature [J]. Journal of Combustion Science and Technology, 2008, 14(3): 221-226.

Google Scholar

[2] Zhang Xinbo. Preparation of Al2O3-supported Co-Mo catalyst through coprecipitation [J]. Chinese Journal of Catalysis, 2009, 30(7): 613-618.

Google Scholar

[3] P. R. Ettireddy, N. Ettireddy, S. Mamedov, et al. Surface characterization studies of TiO2 supported manganese oxide catalysts for low temperature SCR of NO with NH3 [J]. Applied Catalysis B: Environmental, 2007(76): 123-134.

DOI: 10.1016/j.apcatb.2007.05.010

Google Scholar

[4] G. Busca, L. Lietti, G. Ramis, et al. Chemical and mechanistic aspects of the selective catalytic reduction of NOx by ammonia over oxide catalysts: A review {TTP}-197.

DOI: 10.1016/s0926-3373(98)00040-x

Google Scholar

[5] M. Kang, D. J. Kim, E. D. Park, et a1. Two-stage catalyst system for selective catalytic reduction of NOx by NH3 at low temperatures [J]. Applied Catalysis: Environmental, 2006, 68: 21-27.

DOI: 10.1016/j.apcatb.2006.07.013

Google Scholar