Bigtoe Sizing Design of Small Biped Robot by Using Gait Generation Method

Article Preview

Abstract:

The study of biped robot has long history and continuation. One of important moving processes is walking procedure. The walking posture is an important research field that always adapts and implements in the biped robot. The walking research field is very interesting because the walking posture of humans is flexible and stable. Additionally, the force that affect on the humans foot is also investigated. This research addresses the walking simulation of small biped robots that have tiptoe and bigtoe. The study based on the assumption that the bigtoe size affects on the walking posture and walking distance. The gait generation method, for finding the proper size of bigtoe, is utilized by varying the bigtoe size. There are two requirements of robot design: go straight and stay within setting conditions. The simulation results of all small biped robot models which have the different bigtoe sizes can walk within setting conditions. There is only one model its bigtoe width per foot width ratio equals 0.28 (or 28% of foot width) has the longest walking distance. Moreover, this ratio is equal to the ratio of humans foot.

You might also be interested in these eBooks

Info:

Periodical:

Pages:

1079-1086

Citation:

Online since:

March 2014

Export:

Price:

Permissions CCC:

Permissions PLS:

Сopyright:

© 2014 Trans Tech Publications Ltd. All Rights Reserved

Share:

Citation:

* - Corresponding Author

[1] M. Hirose, Y. Haikawa, T. Takenaka and K. Hirai, in: Development of Humanoid Robot ASIMO, Proc. of IEEE/RSJ International Conference on Intelligent Robots and Systems, Workshop2, (2001).

Google Scholar

[2] K. Hashimoto, Y. Takazaki, K. Hattori, H. Kondo, T. Takashima, H. Lim and A. Takanishi, in: A study of Function of Foot's Medial Longitudinal Arch Using Biped Humanoid Robot, The International Conference on Intelligent Robots and Systems IEEE/RSJ, Taipei, Taiwan (2010).

DOI: 10.1109/iros.2010.5650414

Google Scholar

[3] K. Kaneko, F. Kanehiro, M. Morisawa, T. Tsuji, K. Miura, S. Kanaoka, S. Kanjita and K. Yokoi, in: Hardware Improvement of Cybernetic Human HRP-4C for Entertainment Use, The 2011 IEEE/RSJ International Conference on Intelligent Robots and Systems, San Francisco, CA, USA, (2011).

DOI: 10.1109/iros.2011.6094415

Google Scholar

[4] J. Perry: Gait Analysis: Normal and Pathological Function, Slack Inc., N.J., (1992), p.82.

Google Scholar

[5] H. K. Cheng, C. Lin, S. Chou, Y. Ju, Y. Lin and M. Wong, in: The Importance of the Great Toe in Balance Performance, Proceedings of the Fifth IASTED International Conference on Biomechanics, BioMech, Vol. 59-63, (2007).

Google Scholar

[6] K. Nerakae and H. Hasegawa in: The Effect of Toe Mechanism for Simulation of Small Biped Walking Robot by Gait Generation, The 11th International Conference on Modeling and Applied Simulation, Vienna, Austria, (2012), pp.80-85.

Google Scholar

[7] KHR-3HV Biped Robot. Information on http: /kondo-robot. com/sys/khr-3hv_detail1.

Google Scholar

[8] Open Dynamics Engine (ODE). Information on http: /www. ode. org.

Google Scholar

[9] S. C. Wearing, S. Urry, J. E. Smeathers and D. Battistutta, in: A Comparison of Gait Initiation and Termination Methods for Obtaining Plantar Foot Pressures, Gait and Posture 10, (1999), pp.255-263.

DOI: 10.1016/s0966-6362(99)00039-9

Google Scholar

[10] Division of the Gait Cycle. Information on http: /biometrics. derawi. com/?page_id=38.

Google Scholar

[11] N. Ito, H. Hasegawa, in: The Robust Design to Generate the Gait Pattern of a Small Biped Robot, Japan Society for Design Engineering(JSDE) Journal, vol. 45, (2010) , pp.304-311.

Google Scholar

[12] M. W. Whittle: An Introduction to Gait Analysis, (2007), 4th ed., Oxford, p.59.

Google Scholar

[13] M. S. Orendurff, A. D. Segal, J. S. Berge, K. C. Flick, D. Spanier, G. K. Klute, in: The Kinematics and Kinetics of Turning: Limb Asymmetries Associated with Walking a Circular Path, Center of Excellence for Limb Loss Prevention and Prosthetic Engineering, Motion Analysis Laboratory, Rehabilitation Research and Development, Veterans Administration Puget Sound Health Care System, Seattle, WA 98108, USA, vol. 23, (2006).

DOI: 10.1016/j.gaitpost.2004.12.008

Google Scholar