Study on Effect of Matrix Properties on Fatigue Damage Initiation of Woven Carbon Fabric Vinylester Composites

Article Preview

Abstract:

Plain woven carbon fabric composites using different types of vinyl ester (VE) resin with different toughness have been prepared. The mechanical performances were characterized by different tests, such as tensile, tension-tension fatigue, thermoelastic stress analysis (TSA) and scanning electron microscope (SEM). The results showed that with increasing of fracture toughness of VE as well as adhesive strength between VE and carbon fiber (CF), the tensile strength improved by a range from 23.1 to 33.9%, and fatigue life of CF/VE composites increased by several times to several ten times when low toughness VE was used as control resin. The fatigue damage initiation of CF/VE composites has been investigated by thermoelastic stress analysis. It was found that the initiation and growth of fatigue damage such as matrix cracks was delayed, the linkage of matrix cracks in transverse bundles was inhibited with increasing of fracture toughness and interfacial shear strength (IFSS) of matrix resin.

You might also be interested in these eBooks

Info:

Periodical:

Pages:

243-249

Citation:

Online since:

March 2014

Export:

Price:

Permissions CCC:

Permissions PLS:

Сopyright:

© 2014 Trans Tech Publications Ltd. All Rights Reserved

Share:

Citation:

[1] A.P. Mouritz, M.K. Bannister, P.J. Falzon, K.H. Leong: Composites Part A: Applied Science and Manufacturing Vol. 30 (1999), p.1445.

DOI: 10.1016/s1359-835x(99)00034-2

Google Scholar

[2] W. E. Daniels, ed. Encyclopedia of Polymer Science and Engineering Vol. 17; Wiley: New York, (1985).

Google Scholar

[3] H. Li, A.C. Rosario, S.V. Davis, T. Glass: J. Adv. Mater. Vol. 28 (1997), p.55.

Google Scholar

[4] P. K. Mallick: Fiber Reinforced Composites, Ch. 1. Marcel Dekker, New York (1993).

Google Scholar

[5] T. Fujii, S. Amijima: Compos. Sci. Technol. Vol. 49 (1993), p.327.

Google Scholar

[6] F. Gao, L. Boniface, S.L. Ogin, P.A. Smith, R.P. Greaves: Compos. Sci. Technol. Vol. 59 (1999), p.123.

Google Scholar

[7] K. Yoshioka, J. C. Seferis: Composites Part A: Applied Science and Manufacturing Vol. 33 (2002), p.1593.

Google Scholar

[8] T.R. Emery, J.M. Dulieu-Barton: Composites Part A: Applied Science and Manufacturing Vol. 41 (2010), p.1729.

Google Scholar

[9] L. Toubal, M. Karama, B. Lorrain: International Journal of Fatigue Vol. 28 (2006), p.1867.

Google Scholar

[10] T. Uenoya, T. Fujii: Key Eng. Materials Vol. 137 (1998), p.139.

Google Scholar

[11] K. Kageyama, K. Ueki, M. Kikuchi: Pro. 6th Int. Congr. Exp. Mech. (1998), p.931.

Google Scholar

[12] R.T. Potter, L.J. Greaves: Proc. SPIE Meeting Vol. 817 (1988), p.134.

Google Scholar

[13] T. Uenoya, T. Fujii: Journal of reinforced plastics and composites Vol. 19 (2000), p.83.

Google Scholar

[14] C.C. Chamis: National Aeronautics and Space Administration Report TN D-5367 (1972).

Google Scholar

[15] Y.Z. Shao, N. T. Phong, K. Okubo, T. Fujii, O. Shibata, Y. Fujita: Advanced Materials Research Vol. 646 (2013), p.38.

Google Scholar

[16] E.K. Gamstedt, L.A. Berglund, T. Peijs: Compos. Sci. Technol. Vol. 59(1999), p.759.

Google Scholar

[17] A. Gagel, B. Fiedler, K. Schulte: Compos. Sci. Technol. Vol. 66 (2006), p.657.

Google Scholar