Effect of Minimum Quantity Lubrication when Turning a Steel Grade

Article Preview

Abstract:

In turning operations a coolant is usually introduced to the cutting zone to reduce the friction developed at the tool-workpiece contact area and remove heat generated because of this rubbing action. Conventionally, a coolant is introduced into the cutting zone in excessive quantities. However, a lot of concern has been raised recently as a result of the uncontrolled using of coolants in the metal cutting industry. Therefore, the concept of minimum quantity lubricant (MQL) has been introduced recently. In this paper, the principle of MQL is utilised in machining of a steel grade. The performance of MQL in terms of surface finish is evaluated against both, the flood coolant and dry cutting modes. The results obtained show that MQL produces acceptable surface finish. Therefore, it is highly recommended to consider the application of MQL instead of flood cooling when turning steel grades.

You might also be interested in these eBooks

Info:

Periodical:

Pages:

392-396

Citation:

Online since:

March 2014

Export:

Price:

Permissions CCC:

Permissions PLS:

Сopyright:

© 2014 Trans Tech Publications Ltd. All Rights Reserved

Share:

Citation:

[1] Young P, Byrne IG, Cotterell M. Manufacturing and the environment. The International Journal of Advanced Manufacturing Technology. 1997; 13: 488-93.

Google Scholar

[2] Zhao J, Ai X, Huang X. Relationship between the thermal shock behavior and the cutting performance of a functionally gradient ceramic tool. Journal of materials processing technology. 2002; 129: 161-6.

DOI: 10.1016/s0924-0136(02)00602-7

Google Scholar

[3] Ezugwu E, Bonney J, Fadare D, Sales W. Machining of nickel-base, Inconel 718, alloy with ceramic tools under finishing conditions with various coolant supply pressures. Journal of materials processing technology. 2005; 162: 609-14.

DOI: 10.1016/j.jmatprotec.2005.02.144

Google Scholar

[4] Rahman M, Senthil Kumar A, Salam M. Experimental evaluation on the effect of minimal quantities of lubricant in milling. International Journal of Machine Tools and Manufacture. 2002; 42: 539-47.

DOI: 10.1016/s0890-6955(01)00160-2

Google Scholar

[5] Su Y, He N, Li L, Li X. An experimental investigation of effects of cooling/lubrication conditions on tool wear in high-speed end milling of Ti-6Al-4V. Wear. 2006; 261: 760-6.

DOI: 10.1016/j.wear.2006.01.013

Google Scholar

[6] Avila R, Abrao A. The effect of cutting fluids on the machining of hardened AISI 4340 steel. Journal of materials processing technology. 2001; 119: 21-6.

DOI: 10.1016/s0924-0136(01)00891-3

Google Scholar

[7] Sales W, Guimaraes G, Machado A, Ezugwu E. Cooling ability of cutting fluids and measurement of the chip-tool interface temperatures. Industrial Lubrication and Tribology. 2002; 54: 57-68.

DOI: 10.1108/00368790210424121

Google Scholar

[8] Vieira J, Machado A, Ezugwu E. Performance of cutting fluids during face milling of steels. Journal of materials processing technology. 2001; 116: 244-51.

DOI: 10.1016/s0924-0136(01)01010-x

Google Scholar

[9] Dhar N, Islam M, Islam S, Mithu M. The influence of minimum quantity of lubrication (MQL) on cutting temperature, chip and dimensional accuracy in turning AISI-1040 steel. Journal of materials processing technology. 2006; 171: 93-9.

DOI: 10.1016/j.jmatprotec.2005.06.047

Google Scholar

[10] Kishawy H, Dumitrescu M, Ng E-G, Elbestawi M. Effect of coolant strategy on tool performance, chip morphology and surface quality during high-speed machining of A356 aluminum alloy. International Journal of Machine Tools and Manufacture. 2005; 45: 219-27.

DOI: 10.1016/j.ijmachtools.2004.07.003

Google Scholar

[11] Attanasio A, Gelfi M, Giardini C, Remino C. Minimal quantity lubrication in turning: effect on tool wear. Wear. 2006; 260: 333-8.

DOI: 10.1016/j.wear.2005.04.024

Google Scholar

[12] Dhar N, Kamruzzaman M, Ahmed M. Effect of minimum quantity lubrication (MQL) on tool wear and surface roughness in turning AISI-4340 steel. Journal of materials processing technology. 2006; 172: 299-304.

DOI: 10.1016/j.jmatprotec.2005.09.022

Google Scholar