Simulation on the Issue of One-Dimension Elastic Stress Pulse in SHTB Bar

Article Preview

Abstract:

Split Hopkinson Tensile Bar (SHTB) apparatus is widely used in experimentally investigating the mechanical properties of materials. The experimental results are significantly depended on the amplitude, the shape and the wave length of incident wave. However, theres no research on the effect of incident wave especially the influence of parts of the SHTB equipment has been put forward. The solid Hopkinson bar has faced many problems. The hollow Hopkinson Bar has more advantages than the solid Hopkinson bar. The mechanism of the overlying and the amplitude of incident wave by FEM has been analyzed, which can give much help for the theory basis of SHTB apparatus development and design to some extend.

You might also be interested in these eBooks

Info:

Periodical:

Pages:

272-277

Citation:

Online since:

March 2014

Export:

Price:

Permissions CCC:

Permissions PLS:

Сopyright:

© 2014 Trans Tech Publications Ltd. All Rights Reserved

Share:

Citation:

* - Corresponding Author

[1] Chen. W, Lu. F, and Cheng. M. Tension and compression tests of two polymers under quasistatic and dynamic loading, Polymer Testing, vol. 21(2), 2002, p.113–121.

DOI: 10.1016/s0142-9418(01)00055-1

Google Scholar

[2] Taniguchi N, Nishiwaki T and Kawada H. Tensile strength of unidirectional CFRP laminate under high strain rate, Advanced Composite Materials, vol. 16(2), 2007, p.167–180.

DOI: 10.1163/156855107780918937

Google Scholar

[3] Huh H, Kang WJ and Han SS. A tension split Hopkinson bar for investigating the dynamic behavior of sheet metals, Experimental Mechanics, vol. 42(1), 2002, p.8–17.

DOI: 10.1007/bf02411046

Google Scholar

[4] Smerd R, Winkler S, Salibury C, Worswick M, Lloyd D, and Finn M. High strain rate tensile testing of automotive aluminum alloy sheet, International Journal of Impact Engineering, vol. 32(1-4), 2005, p.541–560.

DOI: 10.1016/j.ijimpeng.2005.04.013

Google Scholar

[5] Yokoyama T. Impact tensile stress-strain characteristics of wrought magnesium alloys, Strain, vol. 39(4), 2003, p.167–175.

DOI: 10.1046/j.1475-1305.2003.00086.x

Google Scholar

[6] Nie X, Song B, Ge Y, Chen WW, and Wearasooriya T. Dynamic tensile testing of soft materials, Experimental Mechanics, vol. 49(4), 2009, p.451–458.

DOI: 10.1007/s11340-008-9133-5

Google Scholar

[7] Noble JP, Harding J. Temperature-measurement in the tensile Hopkinson bar test, Measurement Science & Technology. Vol. 5(1), 1994, p.1161–1171.

DOI: 10.1088/0957-0233/5/9/019

Google Scholar

[8] Gerlach R, Siviour CR, Petrinic N and Wiegand J. Experimental characterization and constitutive modeling of RTM-6 resin under impact loading, Polymer, vol. 49(11) , 2008, p.2728–2737.

DOI: 10.1016/j.polymer.2008.04.018

Google Scholar

[9] Gerlach R, Siviour CR, Wiegand J and Petrinic N. In-plate and through-thickness properties, failure models, damage and delamination in 3D woven carbon fibre composites subjected to impact loading, Composites Science and Technology, vol. 72(3), 2012, p.397.

DOI: 10.1016/j.compscitech.2011.11.032

Google Scholar

[10] Arthington MR, Siviour CR and Petrinic N. Improved materials characterization through the application of geometry reconstruction to quasi-static and high-strain-rate tension tests, International Journal of Impact Engineering, vol. 46(0), 2012, p.86.

DOI: 10.1016/j.ijimpeng.2012.02.005

Google Scholar

[11] Guzman O, Frew DJ and Chen W. A Kolsky tension bar technique using a hollow incident tube, Measurement Science & Technology, vol. 22(4), 2011, p.79–87.

DOI: 10.1088/0957-0233/22/4/045703

Google Scholar

[12] Song B, Antoun BR, Connelly K, Korellis J, Lu WY. Improved Kolsky tension bar for high-rate tensile characterization of materials, Measurement Science & Technology, vol. 22(4), 2011, p.65–78.

DOI: 10.1088/0957-0233/22/4/045704

Google Scholar

[13] Sun X, Soulami A, Choi KS, Guzman O, Chen W. Effects of sample geometry and loading rate on tensile ductility of TRIP800 steel, Materials Science and Engineering: A, vol. 541(0), 2012, p.1–7.

DOI: 10.1016/j.msea.2011.12.115

Google Scholar