Optimization and Means of Urban Traffic Structure

Article Preview

Abstract:

With the development of society and economy of China, levels in urbanization and motorization levels are in a rapid growth, triggering a series of problems in socio-economic efficiency and the quality of residents, resulting in the relative lack of supply capacity. From this point, a analytic hierarchy process based on the acquisition of the economic attributes in the whole city's main transport was used to clarify the structure of urban traffic optimization goals ordered by priority modes of transportation in the evaluation system.

You might also be interested in these eBooks

Info:

Periodical:

Pages:

4096-4099

Citation:

Online since:

March 2014

Export:

Price:

Permissions CCC:

Permissions PLS:

Сopyright:

© 2014 Trans Tech Publications Ltd. All Rights Reserved

Share:

Citation:

* - Corresponding Author

[1] Campagna M, Satta G, Campo L et al Analysis of potential influence factors on background urinary benzene concentration among a non-smoking, non-occupationally exposed general population sample. Int Arch Occup Environ Health, 2013, 27(12): 237-242.

DOI: 10.1007/s00420-013-0925-2

Google Scholar

[2] Penelo E, Negrete A, Portell M et al. Psychometric Properties of the Eating Disorder Examination Questionnaire (EDE-Q) and Norms for Rural and Urban Adolescent Males and Females in Mexico. PLoS One, 2013, 8(12): e83245.

DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0083245

Google Scholar

[3] Liu H Y, Skjetne E, Kobernus M. Mobile phone tracking: in support of modelling traffic-related air pollution contribution to individual exposure and its implications for public health impact assessment. Environ Health, 2013, 12(1): 93-96.

DOI: 10.1186/1476-069x-12-93

Google Scholar

[4] André M, Villanova A. Characterisation of an urban bus network for environmental purposes. Sci Total Environ, 2004, 1: 334-335.

DOI: 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2004.04.071

Google Scholar

[5] Scheepers E, Wendel-Vos W, van Kempen E et al. Personal and environmental characteristics associated with choice of active transport modes versus car use for different trip purposes of trips up to 7. 5 kilometers in the Netherlands. PLoS One, 2013, 8(9): e73105.

DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0073105

Google Scholar

[6] Duncan M. The impact of transit-oriented development on housing prices in San Diego, CA. Urban Stud, 2011, 48(1): 101-27.

DOI: 10.1177/0042098009359958

Google Scholar

[7] Di Lonardo S, Nuvolone D, Forastiere F et al. Policies for the promotion of sustainable mobility and the reduction of traffic-related air pollution in the cities participating in the EpiAir2 project. Epidemiol Prev, 2013, 37(4-5): 242-251.

Google Scholar

[8] Messenger T, Ewing R. Transit-oriented development in the sunbelt. Transpor Res, 1996, 1552: 145-153.

Google Scholar

[9] Cevero R. Mixed land-uses and commuting: evidence from the American housing survey. Transport Res. A, 1996, 5: 361-377.

Google Scholar

[10] McCulloch, Robert E, Rossi P E. An extract likehood analysis of the multinomial Probit Model. J. Econometrics. 1994, 64: 217-228.

Google Scholar

[11] Bourne L S. Evaluating the aggregate spatial structure of Canadian metropolitan areas. Can Geogr, 1987, 31(3): 194-208.

DOI: 10.1111/j.1541-0064.1987.tb01234.x

Google Scholar

[12] Gyrd-Hansen D. Using the stated preference technique for eliciting valuations: the role of the payment vehicle. Pharmacoeconomics, 2013, 31(10): 853-861.

DOI: 10.1007/s40273-013-0086-x

Google Scholar