Clustering Approach to Construct Knowledge Management for Statistics Concepts of University Students

Article Preview

Abstract:

The purpose of this study is to develop a methodology as to the knowledge management of concept structure for learners. Fuzzy clustering is adopted to implement classification so that learners of the same cluster have homogeneity and display common features of cognition diagnosis. In addition, fuzzy clustering is based on information of concept scoring and caution index from polytomous student-problem chart. In the study, the empirical data is the assessment of statistics concepts from university students. The results show that there are four clusters and each cluster has its own cognitive characteristics. To sum up, the methodology can improve knowledge management in classroom more feasible. Finally, some recommendations and suggestions for future investigations are also discussed.

You might also be interested in these eBooks

Info:

Periodical:

Pages:

2197-2201

Citation:

Online since:

May 2011

Export:

Price:

Permissions CCC:

Permissions PLS:

Сopyright:

© 2011 Trans Tech Publications Ltd. All Rights Reserved

Share:

Citation:

[1] M. Claire : Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology Vol. 53 (2002) pp.1009-1018.

Google Scholar

[2] J. Ferguson: Knowledge Management for Development Journal Vol. 1 (2005) p.46–54.

Google Scholar

[3] K. M. Sheehan: Journal of Educational Measurement Vol. 34 (1997) pp.333-352.

Google Scholar

[4] J. C. Falmagne: Journal of Mathematical Psychology Vol. 37 (1993) pp.489-512.

Google Scholar

[5] Y. H. Lin, W. M. Bart and K. J. Huang: WPIRS Software [Manual and Sftware for Gneralized Soring of Item Relational Structure] (2006).

Google Scholar

[6] T. Sato: NEC Educational Information Bulletin 80-1 (1980).

Google Scholar

[7] T. Sato: Introduction to S-P Curve Theory Analysis and Evaluation (Tokyo, Meiji Tosho 1985).

Google Scholar

[8] D. J. Chen, A. F. Lai, and I. C. Liu: Journal of Information Science and Engineering Vol. 21 (2005) pp.1007-1030.

Google Scholar

[9] T. R. Rhoads, and N.F. Hubele: IEEE Transactions on Education Vol. 43 (2000) pp.182-187.

Google Scholar

[10] S. Barone, and E. L. Franco: Journal of Statistics Educatio Vol. 18 (2010) pp.1-25.

Google Scholar

[11] J. Garfield, and A. Ahlgren: Journal for Research in Mathematics Education Vol. 19 (1988) pp.44-63.

Google Scholar

[12] L. A. Zadeh: Information and Control Vol. 8 (1965) pp.338-353.

Google Scholar

[13] J. C. Bezdek: Pattern Recognition with Fuzzy Objective Function Algorithm (Plenum., New York 1981).

Google Scholar

[14] N. Zahid, M. Limouri, and A. Essaid: Pattern Recognition Vol. 32 (1999) pp.1089-1097.

DOI: 10.1016/s0031-3203(98)00157-5

Google Scholar

[15] J. C. Falmagne: Journal of Mathematical Psychology Vol. 37 (1993) pp.489-512.

Google Scholar