Sustainable and Deconstructable Semi-Rigid Flush End Plate Composite Joints

Article Preview

Abstract:

Composite construction is a popular and effective method of construction, exploiting the strengths of both reinforced concrete and structural steel in building construction in a complementary fashion. Within paradigms related to minimisation of emissions and maximisation of product recycling, these composite systems are problematic on a number of fronts. Firstly, common and traditional composite systems utilise ordinary Portland cement, which is known to be a very large contributor to atmospheric CO2 emissions. Secondly, for typical construction practices for steel-concrete composite systems, casting of the concrete onto profiled steel decking and conventional reinforcement placing are undertaken on-site, which is time consuming and labour intensive, and which can increase the cost of construction. Thirdly, composite action between the steel beam and the concrete slab is usually achieved by using headed shear studs. The headed shear studs connect these two elements permanently, which leads to much waste at the end of the service life of the building when it is demolished. This paper models a sustainable semi-rigid beam-to-column composite blind bolted connection with deconstructable bolted shear connectors using ABAQUS finite element (FE) software. In this “green” system, precast geopolymer concrete (GPC) slabs are attached compositely to the steel beam via pretensioned bolted shear connectors and the composite beam is connected to GPC-filled square columns using blind bolts. Non-linear material properties and non-linear geometric effects are considered in the simulation of a connection in hogging bending. Based on the FE modelling, using pretensioned bolts as shear connectors with GPC can improve the behaviour of semi-rigid flush end plate composite joints in terms of ductility and load capacity. Moreover, the behaviour of the bolted shear connectors should be considered in composite joint design as being very different to headed stud connectors.

You might also be interested in these eBooks

Info:

Periodical:

Pages:

557-563

Citation:

Online since:

May 2014

Export:

Price:

Permissions CCC:

Permissions PLS:

Сopyright:

© 2014 Trans Tech Publications Ltd. All Rights Reserved

Share:

Citation:

* - Corresponding Author

[1] Ataei A. and Bradford M.A. (2013) FE modelling of semi-rigid flush end plate joints with concrete-filled steel tubular columns. 5th International Conference on Structural Engineering, Mechanics and Computation, Cape Town, South Africa.

DOI: 10.1201/b15963-94

Google Scholar

[2] Bonilla Rocha J.D., Arrizabalaga E.M., Larrua Quevedo R. and Recarey Morfa C.A. (2012) Behavior and strength of welded stud shear connectors in composite beam. Revista Facultad de Ingeniería Universidad de Antioquia 63: 93-104 (in English).

DOI: 10.4067/s0718-915x2015000300006

Google Scholar

[3] Bradford M.A. and Pi Y. -L. (2012a) Numerical modelling of deconstructable composite beams with bolted shear connectors. Conference on Numerical Modeling Strategies for Sustainable Concrete Structures, Aix-en-Provence, France, II-2, 1-8.

Google Scholar

[4] Bradford M.A. and Pi Y. -L. (2012b) Numerical modelling of composite steel-concrete beams for life-cycle deconstructability. 1st International Conference on Performance-Based and Life-Cycle Structural Engineering, Hong Kong, 102-109.

Google Scholar

[5] Bradford M.A. and Pi Y. -L. (2013) Nonlinear elastic-plastic analysis of composite members of high-strength steel and geopolymer concrete. Computer Modeling in Engineering and Sciences 2320: 1-27.

Google Scholar

[6] Carreira D.J. and Ku K.H. (1985) Stress-strain relationship for plain concrete in compression. ACI Structural Journal 82: 797-804.

Google Scholar

[7] Dallam L.N. (1968) Pushout tests with high strength bolt shear connectors. Report for Missouri State Highway Department, Department of Civil Engineering, University of Missouri-Columbia, Missouri.

DOI: 10.30919/es8d516

Google Scholar

[8] Dallam L.N. and Harpster J.L. (1968) Composite beam tests with high-strength bolt shear connectors. Report for Missouri State Highway Department, Department of Civil Engineering, University of Missouri-Columbia, Missouri.

DOI: 10.30919/es8d516

Google Scholar

[9] Davidovits J. (1994) High-alkali cements for 21st century concretes. In: Concrete Technology, Past Present and Future, P. Kumar Metha (ed. ), ACI SP-144, 383-397.

DOI: 10.14359/4523

Google Scholar

[10] Dedic D.J. and Klaiber F.W. (1984) High-strength bolts as shear connectors in rehabilitation work. Concrete International 1984: 41-46.

Google Scholar

[11] Hungerford B.E. (2004) Methods to develop composite action in non-composite bridge floor systems: Part II. M.S. Thesis. Department of Civil, Architectural and Environmental Engineering, University of Texas at Austin, Texas.

Google Scholar

[12] Kayir H. (2006).

Google Scholar

[13] Kwon G., Engelhardt, M.D. and Klinger, R.E. (2010) Behavior of post-installed shear connectors under static and fatigue loading. Journal of Constructional Steel Research 66: 532-541.

DOI: 10.1016/j.jcsr.2009.09.012

Google Scholar

[14] Kwon G., Engelhardt, M.D. and Klinger, R.E. (2011) Experimental behavior of bridge beams retrofitted with post-installed shear connectors. Journal of Bridge Engineering, ASCE 16: 536-545.

DOI: 10.1061/(asce)be.1943-5592.0000184

Google Scholar

[15] Lee S.S.M. and Bradford M.A. (2013) Sustainable composite beams with deconstructable shear connectors. 5th International Conference on Structural Engineering, Mechanics and Computation, Cape Town, South Africa.

DOI: 10.1201/b15963-249

Google Scholar

[16] Loh H.Y., Uy B. and Bradford M.A. (2006) The effects of partial shear connection in composite flush end plate joints. Part I - experimental study. Journal of Constructional Steel Research 62: 232-246.

DOI: 10.1016/j.jcsr.2005.07.012

Google Scholar

[17] Marshall W.T., Nelson H.M. and Banerjee, H.K. (1971) An experimental study of the use of high-strength friction-grip bolts as shear connectors in composite beams. The Structural Engineer 49: 171-178.

Google Scholar

[18] Mirza O. and Uy B. (2011) Behaviour of composite beam-column flush end-plate connections subjected to low-probability, high-consequence loading. Engineering Structures 33: 642-662.

DOI: 10.1016/j.engstruct.2010.11.024

Google Scholar

[19] Ng T.S. (2011) An investigation into the development of high performance geopolymer concrete. PhD Thesis, The University New South Wales, Sydney, Australia.

Google Scholar

[20] Rowe M. and Bradford M.A. (2013).

Google Scholar

[21] Schaap B.A. (2004) Methods to develop composite action in non-composite bridge floor systems: Part I. M.S. thesis. Department of Civil, Architectural and Environmental Engineering, University of Texas at Austin, Texas.

Google Scholar