Generalised Beam Theory (GBT) for Shear Deformable Stiffened Sections

Article Preview

Abstract:

A Generalised Beam Theory (GBT) formulation is presented to analyse the structural behaviour of shear deformable thin-walled members with partially stiffened cross-sections located at arbitrary locations along their length. The deformation modes used in the formulation are taken as the dynamic eigenmodes of a planar frame representing the unstiffened cross-section. Constraint equations are derived and implemented in the GBT member analysis to model the influence of rigid stiffeners on the member response. The accuracy of the approach is validated against a shell finite element model developed in Abaqus. A numerical example describing the linear elastic behaviour of partially stiffened thin-walled member is provided to outline the usability and flexibility of the proposed method.

You might also be interested in these eBooks

Info:

Periodical:

Pages:

600-605

Citation:

Online since:

May 2014

Export:

Price:

Permissions CCC:

Permissions PLS:

Сopyright:

© 2014 Trans Tech Publications Ltd. All Rights Reserved

Share:

Citation:

* - Corresponding Author

[1] R. Schardt, Verallgemeinerte Technicsche Biegetheory. Springler-Verlag, Germany, (1989).

Google Scholar

[2] N. Silvestre, and D. Camotim, First-order generalised beam theory for arbitrary orthotropic materials, Thin- Walled Structures. 40 (2002) 755-789.

DOI: 10.1016/s0263-8231(02)00025-3

Google Scholar

[3] R. Goncalves, P.B. Dinis, D. Camotim, GBT formula-tion to analyse the first-order and buckling behavior of thin-walled members with arbitrary cross-sections, Thin-Walled Structures. 47 (2009) 583-600.

DOI: 10.1016/j.tws.2008.09.007

Google Scholar

[4] C. Basaglia, D. Camotim, N. Silvestre, Global buckling analysis of plane and space thin-walled frames in the con-text of GBT, Thin-Walled Structures. 46 (2008) 79-101.

DOI: 10.1016/j.tws.2007.07.007

Google Scholar

[5] N. Silvestre, B. Young, D. Camotim, Non-linear behav-iour and load-carrying capacity of CFRP-strengthened lipped channel steel columns, Engineering Structures. 30 (2008) 2613-2630.

DOI: 10.1016/j.engstruct.2008.02.010

Google Scholar

[6] N. Silvestre, D. Camotim, N.F. Silva, Generalised beam theory revisited: from kinematical assumptions to the de-formation mode determination, International Journal of Structural Stability and Dynamics. 11 (5) (2011) 969-997.

DOI: 10.1142/s0219455411004427

Google Scholar

[7] M.J. Andreassen, and J. Jönsson, Distortional solutions for loaded semi-discretized thin-walled beams, Thin-Walled Structures. 50 (2012) 116-127.

DOI: 10.1016/j.tws.2011.08.013

Google Scholar

[8] G. Piccardo, G. Ranzi, and A. Luongo, A complete dynamic approach to the Generalized Beam Theory cross-section analysis including extension and shear modes. Mathematics and Mechanics of Solids. (2013).

DOI: 10.1177/1081286513493107

Google Scholar

[9] ABAQUS. Standard User's Manual, Version 6. 8-1, Hibbitt, Karlsson and Sorensen, Inc, Vols. 1-3, USA, (2008).

Google Scholar

[10] K.J. Bathe, Finite element procedures, Prentice Hall, Englewood Cliffs, (2006).

Google Scholar

[11] G. Ranzi, and A. Luongo, A new approach for thin-walled member analysis in the framework of GBT. Thin-Walled Structures. 49 (2011) 1404-1414.

DOI: 10.1016/j.tws.2011.06.008

Google Scholar