Dynamic Analysis of Structures with Interval Parameters under Stochastic Process Excitation

Article Preview

Abstract:

This paper presents the interval dynamic analysis of structures with uncertain-but-bounded parameters under stochastic process excitations. Structural natural frequencies and mean square values of structural random responses are not deterministic values but intervals. The interval problems are converted to optimization problems. Mathematical models are developed to find the bounds of interval natural frequencies and mean square displacements. An improved particle swarm optimization algorithm, namely lower sequence initialized high-order nonlinear particle swarm optimization algorithm, is employed to capture the exact bounds of structural dynamic characteristics and random vibration responses. Numerical example is used to demonstrate the presented method. Quasi-Monte Carlo simulations are also implemented to validate the change ranges of structural natural frequencies and mean square displacements produced by the proposed method.

You might also be interested in these eBooks

Info:

Periodical:

Pages:

699-704

Citation:

Online since:

May 2014

Export:

Price:

Permissions CCC:

Permissions PLS:

Сopyright:

© 2014 Trans Tech Publications Ltd. All Rights Reserved

Share:

Citation:

* - Corresponding Author

[1] R. E. Moore (1966), Interval Analysis. Prentice-Hall, Englewood Cliffs, N.J., 1966. Science , 158, p.365.

DOI: 10.1126/science.158.3799.365

Google Scholar

[2] W. Gao (2007), Random seismic response analysis of truss structures with uncertain parameters. Engineering Structures, 29, pp.1487-1498.

DOI: 10.1016/j.engstruct.2006.08.025

Google Scholar

[3] D. Moens, D. Vandepitte (2001), Envelope frequency response function calculation of uncertain structures. Proceedings on Noise and Vibration Engineering, 1 - 3, pp.395-402.

Google Scholar

[4] Z. P. Qiu, X. J. Wang, M. I. Friswell (2005), Eigenvalue bounds of structures with uncertain-but-bounded parameters. Journal of Sound and Vibration, 282, pp.297-312.

DOI: 10.1016/j.jsv.2004.02.051

Google Scholar

[5] J. Kennedy, R. Eberhart (1995), Particle swarm optimization, Proceedings, IEEE International Conference on Neural Networks.

Google Scholar

[6] E. Elbeltagi, T. Hegazy, D. Grierson (2005), Comparison among five evolutionary-based optimization algorithms. Advanced Engineering Informatics, 19, pp.43-53.

DOI: 10.1016/j.aei.2005.01.004

Google Scholar

[7] Y.K. Lin, Y. Yong (1987), Evolutionary Kanai-Tajimi Type Earthquake Models. Stochastic Approaches in Earthquake Engineering. Y. K. Lin and R. Minai, Springer Berlin Heidelberg, 32, pp.174-203.

DOI: 10.1007/978-3-642-83252-9_11

Google Scholar

[8] N. Liu, W. Gao, C. Song, N. Zhang, Y.L. Pi (2013), Interval dynamic response analysis of vehicle-bridge interaction system with uncertainty. Journal of Sound and Vibration, 332, pp.3218-3231.

DOI: 10.1016/j.jsv.2013.01.025

Google Scholar