The Effect of Water Hammer on Pressure Oscillation of Hydrogen Natural Gas Transient Flow

Article Preview

Abstract:

The unexpected closing of a control valve or pumping, which can be planned or accidental could lead to pressure oscillation commonly known as water hammer. Pressure waves oscillation in the fluid flow interaction leads to unsteady state phenomenon. Numerical computation on transient flow model of hydrogen natural gas mixture (HCNG) in a pipeline where different types of valves are considered for effective delivery and safety. Reduced order modeling (ROM) technique is employed in the transient analysis of high pressured HCNG in a short pipe. The flow is governed by a system of Euler equations that are discretized using the implicit Steger-Warming flux vector splitting method (FSM). Eigenmode analysis and the subsequent construction of ROM use only a few dominant flow eigenmodes. The boundary conditions are imposed using the closure law at the upstream and downstream of the pipeline. The effect of closure function is analyzed and the results are presented on different mass ratios and HCNG flow parameters. The transient pressure oscillations of HCNG at different closure functions are compared so as to test the best type of valve for HCNG transportation. The highest and lowest value of transient pressure wave occurs when instantaneous and convex closure law is considered, respectively.

You might also be interested in these eBooks

Info:

Periodical:

Pages:

251-255

Citation:

Online since:

June 2014

Export:

Price:

Permissions CCC:

Permissions PLS:

Сopyright:

© 2014 Trans Tech Publications Ltd. All Rights Reserved

Share:

Citation:

* - Corresponding Author

[1] W. Erath, B. Nowotny, J. Maetz, Modelling the fluid structure interaction produced by a waterhammer during shutdown of high-pressure pumps, Nuclear Engineering and Design, 193(1999) 14.

DOI: 10.1016/s0029-5493(99)00185-5

Google Scholar

[2] E. Uspuras, A. Kaliatka, G. Dundulis, Analysis of potential waterhammer at the Ignalina NPP using thermal–hydraulic and structural analysis codes, Nuclear Engineering and Design, 203(2001) 12.

DOI: 10.1016/s0029-5493(00)00292-2

Google Scholar

[3] P.G. Provenzano, F. Baroni, R.J. Aguerre, The closing function in the waterhammer modeling. Latin American applied research, 41(2011) 43-47.

Google Scholar

[4] A.R. Lohrasbi R. Attarnejad, Water hammer Analysis by Characteristic Method. American Journal of Engineering and Applied Sciences, 1 (2008) 8.

DOI: 10.3844/ajeassp.2008.287.294

Google Scholar

[5] K.C. Hall, Eigenanalysis of unsteady flows about airfoils, cascades, and wings. AIAA Journal,. 32(1994) 2426-2432.

DOI: 10.2514/3.12309

Google Scholar

[6] A.J. Mahajan, E.H. Dowell, D.B. Bliss, Eigenvalue calculation procedure for an Euler/Navier-Stokes solver with application to flows over airfoils. Journal of Computational Physics,. 97(1991) 398-413.

DOI: 10.1016/0021-9991(91)90006-7

Google Scholar

[7] B.I. Epureanu, K.C. Hall, E.H. Dowell, Reduced order model of unsteady viscous flows in turbomachinery using viscous- inviscid coupling. Journal of Fluids and Structures, 15 (2001)19.

DOI: 10.1006/jfls.2000.0334

Google Scholar

[8] D. Yanpeng, L. Yuxing, Study on Effect of Valve Operation on Transient Flow in Natural Gas Pipelines in 2010, International Conference on Digital Manufacturing & Automation. 2010, IEEE ChangSha , China.

DOI: 10.1109/icdma.2010.359

Google Scholar

[9] M. Behbahani-Nejad, H. Haddadpour, V. Esfahanian, Reduced Order Modelling of unsteady flow without static correction requirement, 24th International Congress of the aeronautical sciences, ICAS. (2004) 8.

DOI: 10.2514/1.7549

Google Scholar

[10] M. Behbahani-Nejad, Y. Shekari, The accuracy and efficiency of a reduced-order model for transient flow analysis in gas pipelines. Journal of Petroleum Science and Engineering,. 73 (2010) 13-19.

DOI: 10.1016/j.petrol.2010.05.001

Google Scholar

[11] Elaoud, S. and E. Hadj-Taieb, Transient flow in pipelines of high-pressure hydrogen-natural gasmixtures. International journal of hydrogen energy, 33: (2008). 8.

DOI: 10.1016/j.ijhydene.2008.06.032

Google Scholar