Rationale in Designing a New System for Gait Rehabilitation

Article Preview

Abstract:

Our multidisciplinary team decided to concentrate efforts in developing a new gait rehabilitation system, able to respond to most of the requirements of an ideal training system. Therefore, we identified the system’s necessary, we compared the costs and the benefits of the existing concepts and systems, and we developed the concept and the design of the system called RELIVE. Developing this system makes the object of a funded national research and development project.

You might also be interested in these eBooks

Info:

Periodical:

Pages:

681-688

Citation:

Online since:

June 2014

Export:

Price:

Permissions CCC:

Permissions PLS:

Сopyright:

© 2014 Trans Tech Publications Ltd. All Rights Reserved

Share:

Citation:

* - Corresponding Author

[1] information at http: /www. who. int/disabilities/technology/jpp/en.

Google Scholar

[2] National Stroke Association. Information at: http: /www. stroke. org.

Google Scholar

[3] Consequences of stroke, information at http: /www. uhnj. org/stroke/stats. htm.

Google Scholar

[4] Gregg EW et al.: Physical activity, falls, and fractures among older adults: a review of the epidemiologic evidence. J Am Geriatr Soc. 2000 Aug; 48(8): 883-93.

DOI: 10.1111/j.1532-5415.2000.tb06884.x

Google Scholar

[5] Fisher SV, Gullickson G Jr.: Energy cost of ambulation in health and disability: a literature review. Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 1978 Mar; 59(3): 124-33.

Google Scholar

[6] Marie-Louise Bird et al.: Age-Related Changes in Physical Fall Risk Factors: Results from a 3 Year Follow-up of Community Dwelling Older Adults in Tasmania, Australia. Int. J. Environ. Res. Public Health 2013, 10, 5989-5997.

DOI: 10.3390/ijerph10115989

Google Scholar

[7] Grimpampi E, et al.: Estimate of lower trunk angles in pathological gaits using gyroscope data. Gait Posture (2013), http: /dx. doi. org/10. 1016/j. gaitpost. 2013. 01. 031.

DOI: 10.1016/j.gaitpost.2013.01.031

Google Scholar

[8] T. Herman.: Gait instability and fractal dynamics of older adults with a cautious" gait: why do certain older adults walk fearfully,. Gait and Posture 21 (2005) 178–185.

DOI: 10.1016/j.gaitpost.2004.01.014

Google Scholar

[9] Bruijn SM et al.: Assessing the stability of human locomotion: a review of current measures. J R Soc Interface 10: 20120999. http: /dx. doi. org/10. 1098/rsif. 2012. 0999.

Google Scholar

[10] Robert Teasell et al.: The Elements of Stroke Rehabilitation available at: http: /www. ebrsr. com.

Google Scholar

[11] Clinical Guidelines for Stroke Management information at: http: /strokefoundation. com. au.

Google Scholar

[12] Information at: http: /www. rcplondon. ac. uk/resources/stroke-guidelines.

Google Scholar

[13] International classification of functioning, disability, and health. Geneva: WHO, (2001).

Google Scholar

[14] Nicholas Stergiou et al.: A Perspective on Human Movement Variability With Applications in Infancy Motor Development. Kinesiology Review, 2013, 2, 93-102.

DOI: 10.1123/krj.2.1.93

Google Scholar

[15] Anindo Roy et al.: Changes in passive ankle stiffness and its effects on gait function in people with chronic stroke. JRRD Volume 50 Number 4, 2013, Pages 555 — 572.

DOI: 10.1682/jrrd.2011.10.0206

Google Scholar

[16] information at: http: /circ. ahajournals. org/content/109/16/2031. full. pdf+html.

Google Scholar

[17] Svetlana Grosu et al.: Human motor adaptation vs. BMI value in conditions of low and high exoskeleton robot compliance: experimental data observations. 9th National Congress on Theoretical and Applied Mechanics, Brussels, 9-10-11 May (2012).

Google Scholar

[18] Jeffrey M Hausdorff: Gait dynamics, fractals and falls: finding meaning in the stride-to-stride fluctuations of human walking Hum Mov Sci. 2007 August ; 26(4): 555–589.

DOI: 10.1016/j.humov.2007.05.003

Google Scholar

[19] Lord S. et al.: Gait variability in older adults: a structured review of testing protocol and clinimetric properties. Gait Posture. 2011 Oct; 34(4): 443-50.

DOI: 10.1016/j.gaitpost.2011.07.010

Google Scholar

[20] Michael J. Socie et al: Gait Variability and Multiple Sclerosis. MultSclerInt. 2013: 645197.

Google Scholar

[21] Nadeau, Stephen et al: Effects of Task-Specific and Impairment-Based Training Compared With Usual Care on Functional Walking Ability After Inpatient Stroke Rehabilitation: LEAPS Trial. Neurorehab and neural repair. Volume: 27, Issue: 4, Pages: 370-380, MAY (2013).

DOI: 10.1177/1545968313481284

Google Scholar

[22] Vijaya Kumar et al.: Effects of Mental Practice on Functional Mobility and Quality of Life in Ambulant Stroke Subjects. IJSR. Vol.: 2, Issue : 5, May 2013. Pages: 434-437.

Google Scholar

[23] Chutima Jalayondeja et al: Factors related to community participation by stroke victims six month post-stroke. Southeast Asian J TropMed PublicHealth. Vol 42 No. 4 July 2011, pages: 1005-1013.

Google Scholar

[24] Eskes G, Salter K: Chapter 7: Mood and Cognition in Stroke. In Lindsay MP et al. (Eds): Canadian Best Practice Recommendations for Stroke Care: 2013; Ottawa, Canadian Stroke Network.

Google Scholar

[25] Van Rijsbergen MWAet al. The COMPlaints After Stroke (COMPAS) study: protocol for a Dutch cohort study on poststroke subjective cognitive complaints. BMJ Open 2013; 3: e003599.

DOI: 10.1136/bmjopen-2013-003599

Google Scholar

[26] Eglė Milinavičienė et al: Effectiveness of the Second-Stage Rehabilitation in Stroke Patients With Cognitive Impairment. Medicina (Kaunas) 2011; 47(9): 486-93.

DOI: 10.3390/medicina47090074

Google Scholar

[27] Luisa Terroni et al.: Association among depression, cognitive impairment and executive dysfunction after stroke. Dement Neuropsychol 2012 September; 6(3): 152-157.

DOI: 10.1590/s1980-57642012dn06030007

Google Scholar

[28] Lars Lünenburger et al. Review. Biofeedback for robotic gait rehabilitation. Journal of NeuroEngineering and Rehabilitation 2007, 4: 1. http: /www. jneuroengrehab. com/content/4/1/1.

DOI: 10.1186/1743-0003-4-1

Google Scholar

[29] Susan P. Barker. Changes in Gait, Balance, and Function with Vestibular Rehabilitation. Thesis. UMI Microform 3126514. Copyright 2004 by ProQuest.

Google Scholar

[30] Ada, Louise et al: Mechanically assisted walking with body weight support results in more independent walking than assisted overground walking in non-ambulatory patients early after stroke: a systematic review. Journal of physiotherapy. Volume: 56, Issue: 3, Pages: 153-161. (2010).

DOI: 10.1016/s1836-9553(10)70020-5

Google Scholar

[31] Candace Tefertiller et al. Efficacy of rehabilitation robotics for walking training in neurological disorders: A review. JRRD, Volume 48, Number 4, 2011, pages: 387–416.

DOI: 10.1682/jrrd.2010.04.0055

Google Scholar

[32] Won Hyuk Chang, Yun-Hee Kim: Robot-assisted Therapy in Stroke Rehabilitation. Review. Journal of Stroke 2013; 15(3): 174-181.

Google Scholar

[33] Catarina O Sousa et al. The use of body weight support on ground level: an alternative strategy for gait training of individuals with stroke. J NeuroEng and Rehab 2009, 6: 43.

Google Scholar

[34] WHO - Health technology assessment, http: /www. who. int/medical_devices/assessment/en.

Google Scholar

[35] INAHTA available at: http: /www. inahta. org.

Google Scholar

[36] Raphael Banz et al. Computerized Visual Feedback: An Adjunct to Robotic-Assisted Gait Training. Physical Therapy Volume 88 Number 10. Pages: 1135-1145.

DOI: 10.2522/ptj.20070203

Google Scholar

[37] Andrew Pennycott et al.: Towards more effective robotic gait training for stroke rehabilitation: a review. Journal of NeuroEngineering and Rehabilitation 2012, 9: 65.

DOI: 10.1186/1743-0003-9-65

Google Scholar

[38] Foley Norine et al: Mobility and the Lower Extremity, in Evidence Based Review of Stroke Rehabilitation, last uptaded: Dec. 2013. available at: http: /www. ebrsr. com/reviews_list. php.

Google Scholar

[39] Hermano I. Krebs et al.: A Paradigm Shift for Rehabilitation Robotics: Therapeutic Robots Enhance Clinician Productivity in Facilitating Patient Recovery. IEEE Eng Med Biol Mag. 2008 ; 27(4): 61–70.

Google Scholar

[40] Annalisa Milella et al (Eds): Mechatronic Systems, Applications. 2010 www. intechweb. org.

Google Scholar

[41] Polese, JC et al: Treadmill training is effective for ambulatory adults with stroke: a systematic review. J OF Physiotherapy, Volume: 59 , Issue: 2 , Pages: 73-80. (2013).

DOI: 10.1016/s1836-9553(13)70159-0

Google Scholar

[42] Web of Knowledge.

Google Scholar

[43] Ariel A. A. Braidot et al: Design of a mechanical system in gait rehabilitation with progressive addition of weight. Journal of Physics: Conference Series 332 (2011) 012045.

DOI: 10.1088/1742-6596/332/1/012045

Google Scholar

[44] Wang P et al.: Modulation of weight off-loading level over body-weight supported locomotion training. IEEE Int Conf Rehabil Robot. 2011; 2011: 5975354.

DOI: 10.1109/icorr.2011.5975354

Google Scholar

[45] States, Rebecca A. et al: Overground Gait Training for Individuals with Chronic Stroke: A Cochrane Systematic Review. J NEUROL PHYS THER. Vol: 33, Issue: 4, Pages: 179-186. (2009).

DOI: 10.1097/npt.0b013e3181c29a8c

Google Scholar

[46] Wessels M. et al.: Body weight-supported gait training for restoration of walking in people with an incomplete spinal cord injury: a systematic review. J Rehabil Med. 2010 Jun; 42(6): 513-9.

DOI: 10.2340/16501977-0525

Google Scholar

[47] Vallery H et al.: Multidirectional transparent support for overground gait training. IEEE Int Conf Rehabil Robot. 2013 Jun; 2013: 1-7.

Google Scholar

[48] Wang P et al.: Synchronized walking coordination for impact-less footpad contact of an overground gait rehabilitation system: NaTUre-gaits. IEEE Int Conf Rehab Robot. 2011: 5975353.

DOI: 10.1109/icorr.2011.5975353

Google Scholar

[49] Hidler, Joseph et al.: ZeroG: Overground gait and balance training system. Journal of Rehabilitation Research and Development48. 4 (2011): 287-98.

DOI: 10.1682/jrrd.2010.05.0098

Google Scholar

[50] Patton, James et al.: KineAssist: Design and Development of a Robotic Overground Gait and Balance Therapy Device. Topics in Stroke Rehabilitation15. 2 (Mar/Apr 2008): 131.

DOI: 10.1310/tsr1502-131

Google Scholar

[51] Wang, Ping et al.: Initial System Evaluation of an Overground Rehabilitation Gait Training Robot (NaTUre-gaits). ADVANCED ROBOTICS. Vol: 25, Issue: 15, Pages: 1927-1948. (2011).

DOI: 10.1163/016918611x587214

Google Scholar

[52] NatureGait Systems info – available at http: /www. youtube. com/watch?v=1iIAGgGAwbc.

Google Scholar

[53] Kineassist info available at: http: /www. kineadesign. com/portfolio/kineassist.

Google Scholar

[54] Sousa et al. Gait training with partial body weight support during overground walking for individuals with chronic stroke: a pilot study. http: /www. jneuroengrehab. com/content/8/1/48.

DOI: 10.1186/1743-0003-8-48

Google Scholar

[55] http: /www. bioness. com/Healthcare_Professionals/Vector_Gait_and_Safety_System. php.

Google Scholar

[56] Vallery H et al.: Multidirectional transparent support for overground gait training. IEEE Int Conf Rehabil Robot. 2013 Jun; 2013: 1-7.

Google Scholar

[57] A. Mokhtarian et al.: An Assistive Passive Pelvic Device for Gait Training and Rehabilitation Using Locomotion Dynamic Model. Indian JSciTech, Vol 6(3), 2013: 4168-4181.

DOI: 10.17485/ijst/2013/v6i3.1

Google Scholar

[58] http: /www. asee. org/documents/sections/middle-atlantic/fall-2013/12-Paper-Kumar. pdf.

Google Scholar

[59] 1st Joint World Congress on Gait and Mental Function abstracts, available at http: /ispgr. silkstart. com/down.

Google Scholar

[60] RELIVE. Sistem mecatronic de realitate 3D pentru recuperarea ambientala a pacientilor cu afectiuni neurologice centrale, http: /www. omtr. pub. ro/cesit/granturi/RELIVE/index. html.

Google Scholar