Estimation of Shoulder Joint Reaction Forces and Moments Using MBS Dynamic Modeling

Article Preview

Abstract:

The paper presents a dynamic model created for estimating the magnitude of reaction forces and moments in the shoulder joint of the human upper limb. Considering that the flexion-extension motion of the forearm is simulated under three different conditions, the reaction forces and moments are determined. The first actuating case is corresponding to the case in which the driving force is acting on the long end of the biceps muscle. In the second case the driving force is acting on the short end of the biceps muscle, and in the third case the driving force is acting on both ends of the biceps muscle.

You might also be interested in these eBooks

Info:

Periodical:

Pages:

701-706

Citation:

Online since:

June 2014

Export:

Price:

Permissions CCC:

Permissions PLS:

Сopyright:

© 2014 Trans Tech Publications Ltd. All Rights Reserved

Share:

Citation:

[1] C.A.M. Doorenbosch, J.J.M. Mouritis, H.E.J. Veeger Harlaar J., F.C.T. van der Helm, Determination of the axes of rotation about the shoulder during elevation. Journal of Orthopedic & Sports Physical Therapy 31, (2001), p.133–137.

DOI: 10.2519/jospt.2001.31.3.133

Google Scholar

[2] N. Klopcar, M. Tomsic, J. Lenarcic, A kinematic model of the shoulder complex to evaluate the arm-reachable workspace, Journal of Biomechanics 40, (2007), p.86–91.

DOI: 10.1016/j.jbiomech.2005.11.010

Google Scholar

[3] J.M. Hollerbach, T. Flash, Dynamic interactions between limb segments during planar arm movement, MIT Artificial Intelligence Laboratory (1981).

DOI: 10.1007/bf00353957

Google Scholar

[4] J. Rosen, J.C. Perry, N. Manning, S. Burns, B. Hannaford, The human arm kinematics and dynamics during daily activities – Toward a 7 DOF Upper Limb Powered Exoskeleton, The 12th International Conference on Advanced Robotics – ICAR 2005–Seattle WA, July (2005).

DOI: 10.1109/icar.2005.1507460

Google Scholar

[5] G. Hiroaki, K. Mitsuo, Human arm stiffness and equilibrium-point trajectory during multi-joint movement, Biological Cybernetics 76, (1997), pp.163-171.

DOI: 10.1007/s004220050329

Google Scholar

[6] V. Ng-Thow-Hing, W. Shao, Modular components for detailed kinematic modelling of joints, International Society of Biomechanics XIXth Congress. July 6-11, (2003).

Google Scholar

[7] D. Drăgulescu, Modelarea în Biomecanică, Ed. Didactică şi Pedagogică, Bucureşti (2005).

Google Scholar

[8] F.H. Martini, Fundamentals of anatomy and physiology, New Jersey: Prentice Hall (1995).

Google Scholar

[9] W. Schiehlen, Computational Dynamics: Theory and Applications of Multibody Systems, European Journal of Mechanics A/Solids, 25, (2006), pp.566-594.

DOI: 10.1016/j.euromechsol.2006.03.004

Google Scholar

[10] A. Shabana, , Dynamics of Multibody Systems, 3rd Edition, Cambridge Univ Pres (2005).

Google Scholar

[11] M. S. Tudoran, D. Ganea, E. Mereuta, C. Mereuta, Experimental research regarding muscles activity, Annals of Dunarea de Jos, University of Galati, Fascicle XV, ISSN 1454-9832, (2012).

DOI: 10.35219/efms

Google Scholar

[12] M. S. Tudoran, D. Ganea, E. Mereuta, C. Mereuta, A model for studying the human upper limb kinematics, Annals of Dunarea de Jos, University of Galati, Fascicle XV, ISSN 1454-9832, (2012).

DOI: 10.35219/efms

Google Scholar

[13] E. Mereuta, M. Tudoran, C. Mereuta, L. G. Ionete, Biomechanical models for the kinematics of upper limb, Annals of Dunarea de Jos, University of Galați, Fascicle II, ISSN 2067-2071, (2011), pp.280-285.

Google Scholar