Multi-Target Direction Measurement of Bistatic MIMO Radar

Abstract:

Multiple-input multiple output (MIMO) radar has been widespread concern in the domestic and foreign researchers. Bistatic radar draws on the great success of MIMO technology in the communications field, and it has many advantages over conventional radar. The direction angles estimations of bistatic MIMO radar are researched. To contrast traditional radar DOA estimates, the direction vector of the bistatic MIMO radar is the Knonecker plot of the emission vector and reception vector, that two-dimensional direction angles is estimated. To solve this problem, the principle of bistatic MIMO radar signal model is in-depthly researched.By proposing Capon dimensionality reduction method, the two-dimensional directions of the dual-based MIMO radar are estimated, and computer simulation is to verify the effectiveness of the method.

• Periodical: Applied Mechanics and Materials (Volumes 556-562)
• Pages: 2797-2801
• DOI: https://doi.org/10.4028/www.scientific.net/AMM.556-562.2797
• Online since: May 2014
• Authors: Jing Fang Wang*
• Keywords: Bistatic Radar, Capon Dimensionality Reduction, Direction-of-Arrival (DOA), Direction-of-Departure (DOD), Multi-Input Multi-Output (MIMO)

References

[1] He Zishu, Han Chunlin, Liu Bo. MIMO radar concept and technical characteristics [J]. E-Journal, 2005, 33 (12A): 2441-2445.

[2] Xu Hongbo, Wang Huaijun, Lu Min, a new MIMO radar DOA estimation method [J] Journal of the National University of Defense Technology, 2009, 31 (3): 92-96.

[3] Xu Hongbo MIMO radar DOA estimation algorithm [J]. Changsha: National Defense University, (2009).

[4] Ju Ting Wang, Jiang Shengli, Jin Ho. Impulsive noise, MIMO radar based on subspace DOA estimation [J]. Journal of Astronautics, 2009, 30 (4): 1653-1657.

[5] Wang Ju Ting, Jiang Shengli, Liu composite Gaussian clutter MIMO radar DOA estimation, Cramer - Rao lower bound [J]. Electronics & Information Technology, 2009, 31 (4): 786-789.

[6] Dai Hei increase, Peng Ning, Tang Jun MIMO radar detection performance [J]. Tsinghua University (Natural Science), 2007, 47 (1): 88-91.

[7] Qujin You, ROCKETS, Chunsheng. Waveform has any correlation of MIMO radar detection performance [J]. Circuits and Systems, 2009, 14 (2): 68-73.

[8] Wang Ju Ting, Jiang Shengli, Jin Ho. Airborne MIMO radar generalized maximum likelihood detector [J]. Electronics and Information Technology, 2009, 31 (6): 1315-1318.

[9] Ghobadzadeh A, Tadaion A A, Taban M R. GLR approach for MIMO radar signal sampling in unknown clutter parameter[C]. International Symposium on Telecommunications, Tehran, 2008: 624-628.

DOI: 10.1109/istel.2008.4651376

[10] Sheikhi A, Zamani A, Norouzi Y. Model-based adaptive target detection in clutter using MIMO radar[C]. CIE International Conference on Radar, Shanghai, 2006: 1-4.

DOI: 10.1109/icr.2006.343477

[11] Sheikhi A, Zamani A. Coherent detection for MIMO radars[C]. IEEE Radar Conference, Boston, MA, 2007: 302-307.

DOI: 10.1109/radar.2007.374232

[12] Xu L Z, Li J. Iterative generalized - likelihood ratio test for MIMO radar[J]. IEEE Transactions on Signal Processing, 2007, 55(6): 2375-2385.

DOI: 10.1109/tsp.2007.893937

[13] Li J, Stoica P, Xu L Z, et al. On parameter identifiability of MIMO radar[J]. IEEE Signal Processing Letters, 2007, 14(12): 968-971.

DOI: 10.1109/lsp.2007.905051

[14] Xu L Z, Li J, Stoica P. Adaptive techniques for MIMO radar[C]. The 4th IEEE Workshop on Sensor Array and Multichannel Signal Processing, Waltham, MA, 2006: 258-262.

[15] Bekkerman I, Tabrikian J. Target detection and localization using MIMO radars and sonars[J]. IEEE Transactions on Signal Processing, 2006, 54(10): 3873-3838.

DOI: 10.1109/tsp.2006.879267