Model for Assigning Project Members to Maximize Personality Balance

Article Preview

Abstract:

Global competition has forced enterprises to constantly innovate business administration and product services, in order to dominate markets and to compete effectively. However, the formulation and execution of strategy and the development of products and services rely largely on a concrete management system that can efficiently produce attractive products within the shortest period of time. Project management is an effective way of achieving these objectives. A temporary task group is formed by borrowing personnel from related divisions, without altering the original organizational structure and adding extra workforce. Various team-building activities are used to quickly transform this group of people into a solid project team and to accomplish the specified project objectives as soon as possible. Traditional assignment of project personnel is based primarily on work experiences and expertise and ignores the role that personalities play in the success of the project. Therefore, this study develops a project assignment quantitative model that maximizes the team’s personality balance by selecting the most suitable personnel from a group of qualified capable candidates, to increase the possibility of success for the project. The results of the example show that the model developed can help a project manager to form a project team in which the members’ personalities are highly balanced, to maximize the project performance.

You might also be interested in these eBooks

Info:

Periodical:

Pages:

6815-6824

Citation:

Online since:

May 2014

Export:

Price:

Permissions CCC:

Permissions PLS:

Сopyright:

© 2014 Trans Tech Publications Ltd. All Rights Reserved

Share:

Citation:

* - Corresponding Author

[1] Akbulut, M. A. and Yilmaz, A. E., (2009), A modified genetic algorithm for the generalized assignment problems, Journal of Electrical and Electronics Engineering, 9(2), pp.951-958.

Google Scholar

[2] Archibald, R. B. (1981), The implementation of project management: The professional's handbook. Massachusetts: Addison-Wesley Publishing.

Google Scholar

[3] Barr, R. S., Glover, F., and Klingdam, D., (1977), The alternating basis algorithm for assignment problems, Mathematical Programming, 13, pp.1-13.

DOI: 10.1007/bf01584319

Google Scholar

[4] Bass, B. M. (1965), Organizational psychology. Boston: Ally and Bacon.

Google Scholar

[5] Belbin, R. M., (1981), Management Teams: Why They Succeed or Fail. New York: Butterworth-Heinemann.

Google Scholar

[6] Belbin, R. M., (2009), http: /www. belbin. com/rte. asp?id=8.

Google Scholar

[7] Blau, P. M., & Scott, W. R. (1963), Formal organizations. London: Routledge Kegan Paul.

Google Scholar

[8] Catrysse, D. van Wassenhove, L. N., (1992), A survey of algorithms for the generalized assignment problem, European Journal of Operational Research, 60, pp.260-272.

DOI: 10.1016/0377-2217(92)90077-m

Google Scholar

[9] Clarke, A. (1999), A practical use of key success factors to improve the effectiveness of project management, International Journal of Project Management, 17( 3), pp.139-145.

DOI: 10.1016/s0263-7863(98)00031-3

Google Scholar

[10] Cleland, D. I., & King, W. R. (1983), System analysis and project management. NY: McGraw Hill Book Company.

Google Scholar

[11] Cleland, D. I. (1986), Project owners: Beware, Project Management Journal, 17(5), pp.83-92.

Google Scholar

[12] Fisher, M. L., Jaikumar, R. and Vanm, W., (1986), A multiplier adjustment method for the generalized assignment problem, Management Science, 32, pp.1095-1103.

DOI: 10.1287/mnsc.32.9.1095

Google Scholar

[13] Garfinkel, R. S., (1971), An improved algorithm for bottleneck assignment problem, , Operations Research, 18, pp.1717-1751.

Google Scholar

[14] Geetha, S., and Nair, K. P. K., (1993), A variation of the assignment problem, , European Journal of Operational Research, 68, pp.422-426.

DOI: 10.1016/0377-2217(93)90198-v

Google Scholar

[15] Katz R. and Allen, T. J., (1985), Project performance and the locus of influence in the R&D matrix, Academy of Management Journal, Vol. 28, No. 1, pp.67-87.

Google Scholar

[16] Kerzner, H., (1984), Project Management: A system approach to planning scheduling and controlling, NY: Van Nostrand Reinhold.

Google Scholar

[17] Kerzner, H. (1994), Project management: A systems approach to planning scheduling and controlling, NY: Van Nostrand Reinhold.

Google Scholar

[18] Kuhn, Harold W., (1955), The Hungarian Method for the assignment problem, , Naval Research Logistics Quarterly, 2, p.83–97.

DOI: 10.1002/nav.3800020109

Google Scholar

[19] Kuhn, Harold W., (1956), Variants of the Hungarian method for assignment problems, , Naval Research Logistics Quarterly, 3, p.253–258.

DOI: 10.1002/nav.3800030404

Google Scholar

[20] Hung, M. S., and Rom, W. O., (1980), Solving the assignment problem by relation, , Operations Research, 28, pp.969-982.

DOI: 10.1287/opre.28.4.969

Google Scholar

[21] Munkres, J., (1957), Algorithms for the Assignment and Transportation Problems, , Journal of the Society for Industrial and Applied Mathematics, 5(1), p.32–38.

Google Scholar

[22] Mazzola, J. B. and Neebe, A. W., (1993), An algorithm for the bottleneck generalized assignment problem, , Computers and Operations Research, 20, pp.355-362.

DOI: 10.1016/0305-0548(93)90079-x

Google Scholar

[23] Mazzola, J. B., (1989), Generalized assignment with nonlinear capacity interaction, Management Science, 35, pp.923-941.

DOI: 10.1287/mnsc.35.8.923

Google Scholar

[24] Mazzola, J. B. and Neebe, A. W., (1988), Bottleneck generalized assignment problems, , Engineering Costs and Production Economy, 14, pp.61-65.

DOI: 10.1016/0167-188x(88)90053-5

Google Scholar

[25] Neebe, A. W. and Rao, M. R., (1983), An algorithm for the fixed-charge assigning users to sources problem, , Journal of Operations Society, 34, pp.1107-1113.

DOI: 10.1057/jors.1983.242

Google Scholar

[26] Oya, I. T. and Walter, O. R., (1998), Analysis of the characteristics of projects in diverse industries, Journal of Operations Management, 16(2), pp.43-61.

Google Scholar

[27] Pinto, J. K. and Slevin, D. P., (1988), Project success: definition and measurement techniques, Project Management Journal, 19(1), pp.67-72.

Google Scholar

[28] Ravindran, A., and Ramaswamy, V., (1977), On the bottleneck assignment problem, , Journal of Optimization Theory and Applications, 21 (1977), pp.451-458.

DOI: 10.1007/bf00933089

Google Scholar

[29] Ravindran, A., Phillips, D. T., and Solberg, T. J., (1987), Operations Research: principles and practice, 2nd Edition, John Wiely and Sons.

Google Scholar

[30] Ross, G. T. and Soland, R. M., (1977), Modeling facility location problems as generalized problems, , Management Science, 24, pp.345-357.

DOI: 10.1287/mnsc.24.3.345

Google Scholar

[31] Zanakis, S. H., (1983), A staff to job assignment (partitioning) problem with multiple objectives, Computer and Operations Research, 10(4), l, pp.357-363.

DOI: 10.1016/0305-0548(83)90010-2

Google Scholar