Using the Fuzzy Preference Relations to Measure the Aggregative Risk Degree of Implementing E-Manufacturing

Article Preview

Abstract:

Today’s competition in manufacturing industry depends not just on lean manufacturing but also on the ability to provide customers with total solutions and life-cycle costs for sustainable value. This study therefore proposes an analytic hierarchy model to help the administrators understand the critical risk factors influence the E-manufacturing system initiation, and an aggregative risk degree is indicated which risk grade they are in. The importance weights of risk factors and possible occurrence ratings of four risk grade (high-risk, medium-risk, low-risk and none-risk) are determined by using consistent fuzzy preference relations. Keywords: E-manufacturing, risk management, fuzzy preference relations.

You might also be interested in these eBooks

Info:

Periodical:

Pages:

351-355

Citation:

Online since:

May 2014

Export:

Price:

Permissions CCC:

Permissions PLS:

Сopyright:

© 2014 Trans Tech Publications Ltd. All Rights Reserved

Share:

Citation:

[1] S. -M. Chen, Fuzzy group decision making for evaluating the rate of aggregative risk in software development, Fuzzy Sets and Systems, vol. 118, pp.75-88, (2001).

DOI: 10.1016/s0165-0114(99)00103-7

Google Scholar

[2] C. C. Wei, et al., An AHP-based approach to ERP system selection, International Journal of Production Economics, vol. 96, pp.47-62, (2005).

Google Scholar

[3] J. Comas, et al., Risk assessment modelling of microbiology-related solids separation problems in activated sludge systems, Environmental Modelling & Software, vol. 23, pp.1250-1261, (2008).

DOI: 10.1016/j.envsoft.2008.02.013

Google Scholar

[4] T. -H. Hsu and L. -Z. Lin, Using fuzzy set theoretic techniques to analyze travel risk: An empirical study, Tourism Management, vol. 27, pp.968-981, (2006).

DOI: 10.1016/j.tourman.2005.10.022

Google Scholar

[5] E. Herrera-Viedma, et al., Some issues on consistency of fuzzy preference relations, European Journal of Operational Research, vol. 154, pp.98-109, (2004).

DOI: 10.1016/s0377-2217(02)00725-7

Google Scholar

[6] F. Chiclana, et al., Integrating three representation models in fuzzy multipurpose decision making based on fuzzy preference relations, Fuzzy Sets and Systems, vol. 97, pp.33-48, (1998).

DOI: 10.1016/s0165-0114(96)00339-9

Google Scholar

[7] F. Chiclana, et al., Integrating multiplicative preference relations in a multipurpose decision-making model based on fuzzy preference relations, Fuzzy Sets and Systems, vol. 122, pp.277-291, (2001).

DOI: 10.1016/s0165-0114(00)00004-x

Google Scholar

[8] F. Herrera and E. Herrera-Viedma, Choice functions and mechanisms for linguistic preference relations, European Journal of Operational Research, vol. 120, pp.144-161, (2000).

DOI: 10.1016/s0377-2217(98)00383-x

Google Scholar

[9] F. Herrera, et al., Multiperson decision-making based on multiplicative preference relations, European Journal of Operational Research, vol. 129, pp.372-385, (2001).

DOI: 10.1016/s0377-2217(99)00197-6

Google Scholar

[10] F. Herrera, et al., A sequential selection process in group decision making with a linguistic assessment approach, Information Sciences, vol. 85, pp.223-239, (1995).

DOI: 10.1016/0020-0255(95)00025-k

Google Scholar