Lot Streaming and Preventive Maintenance in a Multiple Product Permutation Flow Shop with Intermingling

Article Preview

Abstract:

A mathematical model forlot streaming problem with preventive maintenance was proposed. A mixed-integer linear model for multiple-product lot streaming problems was also developed. Mixed-integer programming formulation was presented which will enable the user to identify optimal sublot sizes and sequences simultaneously. Two situations were considered:1) all machines were available, and 2) all machines needed preventive maintenance tasks. For both situations a new mixed-integer formulation was developed. To demonstrate the practicality of the proposed model, numerical example was used. It showed that the percentage of make span reduction due to lot streaming in permutation flow shop is 54% when compared to consistent sublots with intermingling case.

You might also be interested in these eBooks

Info:

Periodical:

Pages:

689-693

Citation:

Online since:

June 2014

Export:

Price:

Permissions CCC:

Permissions PLS:

Сopyright:

© 2014 Trans Tech Publications Ltd. All Rights Reserved

Share:

Citation:

* - Corresponding Author

[1] R. Lundrigan, Production and Inventory Management, Vol. 27(2)(1986), pp.2-11.

Google Scholar

[2] A.A. Kalirand S. C. Sarin, International Journal of Production Economics, Vol. 66(2) (2000), pp.131-142.

Google Scholar

[3] M. FeldmannandD. Biskup, International Journal of Production Research, Vol. 46(1)(2008), pp.197-216.

Google Scholar

[4] S.C. SarinandP. Jaiprakash, in: Flow shop lot streaming problems, Springer (2007).

Google Scholar

[5] W. Zhang,C. Yin, J. LiuandR.J. Linn, International Journal of Production Economics, Vol. 96(2)(2005), pp.189-200.

Google Scholar

[6] A.A. Kalirand S.C. Sarin, Journal of Combinatorial Optimization, Vol. 7(1)(2003), pp.23-44.

Google Scholar

[7] D. Biskupand M. Feldmann, Journal of the Operational Research Society, Vol. 57(3)(2005), pp.296-303.

Google Scholar

[8] D. TrietschandK.R. Baker, Operations Research, Vol. 41(6) (1993), pp.1065-1076.

Google Scholar

[9] C. PottsandK. Baker, Operations Research Letters, Vol. 8(6)(1989), pp.297-303.

Google Scholar

[10] H. Chiu, J. Changand C. Lee, Computers & Operations Research, Vol. 31(12) (2004), p.2003-(2020).

Google Scholar

[11] J.H. ChangandH.N. Chiu: International Journal of Production Research, Vol. 43(8) (2005), pp.1515-1536.

Google Scholar