Courtyard as a Microclimatic Modifier Experimental Study on Actual Site

Abstract:

An experimental study of two different forms of courtyards has been conducted in an existing hospital building, in the tropics. The experiments involved three design variants, namely form, size, and orientation. Three weather stations were used in three different courtyards, O-and U-forms and the third one was located in the outdoor area as benchmark. The courtyard, as a microclimatic modifier, has the ability to improve the thermal and the visual condition within the semi-outdoor area. Therefore, four physical environments variables, namely air temperature, humidity, solar intensity and wind were investigated and analyzed as these variables have not previously been studied in a single experiment of courtyard. The aim of this paper is to measure and examine the differences of thermal and visual performance in the courtyards during daytime. The results showed that form, wind orientation and number of floors had a significant effect on the microclimate and visual performance of the courtyard. Forms, orientation and number of floors are the key design variants that show a significant effect in the U-form courtyard.

• Periodical: Applied Mechanics and Materials (Volume 567)
• Pages: 14-19
• DOI: https://doi.org/10.4028/www.scientific.net/AMM.567.14
• Online since: June 2014
• Authors: Almhafdy Abdulbasit*, Ibrahim Norhati, Sabarinah Sh. Ahmad, Wan Mohd. Naim Wan Salleh
• Keywords: Courtyard, Design Variants, Experimental Study, Microclimate Performance

References

[1] B. Edwards, M. Sibley, M. Hakmi, and p. Land, Courtyard housing: past, present and future: Spon Press, (2006).

DOI: 10.4324/9780203646724

[2] J. Reynolds, Courtyards: aesthetic, social, and thermal delight: Wiley, (2002).

[3] T. A. Saeed, Studies on the geometrical properties of courtyard house form considering natural ventilation in hot-dry regions, 3492493 Ph.D., Illinois Institute of Technology, Ann Arbor, (2007).

[4] N. Das, Courtyards houses of Kolkata: Bioclimatic, typological and socio-cultural study, Msc, Department of Architecture, College of Architecture, Planning and Design, Kansas State University, (2006).

[5] I. A. Meir, D. Pearlmutter, and Y. Etzion, On the microclimatic behavior of two semi-enclosed attached courtyards in a hot dry region, Building and Environment, vol. 30, pp.563-572, (1995).

DOI: 10.1016/0360-1323(95)00018-2

[6] H. Safarzadeh and M. N. Bahadori, Passive cooling effects of courtyards, Building and Environment, vol. 40, pp.89-104, (2005).

DOI: 10.1016/j.buildenv.2004.04.014

[7] A. Aldawoud, Thermal performance of courtyard buildings, Energy and Buildings, vol. 40, pp.906-910, (2008).

DOI: 10.1016/j.enbuild.2007.07.007

[8] A. S. Muhaisen and M. B Gadi, Shading performance of polygonal courtyard forms, Building and Environment, vol. 41, pp.1050-1059, (2006).

DOI: 10.1016/j.buildenv.2005.04.027

[9] P. Moonen, V. Dorer, and J. Carmeliet, Evaluation of the ventilation potential of courtyards and urban street canyons using RANS and LES, Journal of Wind Engineering and Industrial Aerodynamics, vol. 99, pp.414-423, 4/ (2011).

DOI: 10.1016/j.jweia.2010.12.012

[10] S. Berkovic, A. Yezioro, and A. Bitan, Study of thermal comfort in courtyards in a hot arid climate, Solar Energy, vol. 86, pp.1173-1186, 5/ (2012).

DOI: 10.1016/j.solener.2012.01.010