Evaluation Model for the E-Learning 2.0 System

Abstract:

E-Learning 2.0 has played a significant role in training and development within the organizational environment. But how to evaluate the E-Learning 2.0 system remains unresolved. This study aims to propose an evaluation model for the enterprise E-Learning 2.0 system based on the information system success model. Firstly, the first level of the evaluation model is established by four aspects, including information quality, system quality, service quality and communication quality. Then, the second level of the evaluation model is constructed for these four aspects respectively. The case study will be in the future research to reveal the performance of E-Learning 2.0 system in the enterprise, which will be the guidance for the implementation of E-Learning 2.0 systems.

• Periodical: Applied Mechanics and Materials (Volumes 571-572)
• Pages: 515-518
• DOI: https://doi.org/10.4028/www.scientific.net/AMM.571-572.515
• Online since: June 2014
• Authors: Bing Wu*, Chen Yan Zhang
• Keywords: E-Learning 2.0, Information Quality, Information System Success Model, System Quality

References

[1] Lau, Rynson W. H.; Yen, Neil Y.; Li, Frederick; et al. Recent development in multimedia e-learning technologies. WORLD WIDE WEB-INTERNET AND WEB INFORMATION SYSTEMS, 17(2), pp.189-198(2014).

DOI: 10.1007/s11280-013-0206-8

[2] Hsia, Jung-Wen; Chang, Chia-Chi; Tseng, Ai-Hua. Effects of individuals' locus of control and computer self-efficacy on their e-learning acceptance in high-tech companies. BEHAVIOUR & INFORMATION TECHNOLOGY, 33(1), pp.51-64 (2014).

DOI: 10.1080/0144929x.2012.702284

[3] Yu-Chien Chen, Ren-Hung Hwang, Cheng-Yu Wang. Development and evaluation of a Web2. 0 annotation system as a learning tool in an E-Learning2. 0 environment. Computer& Education, 58, pp.1094-1105 (2012).

[4] DeLone W.H., & McLean, E.R. The DeLone and McLean model of information systems success: a ten-year update. Journal of Management Information Systems, 19(4): 9–30 (2003).

DOI: 10.1080/07421222.2003.11045748

[5] Palacios-Marques, Daniel; Cortes-Grao, Rocio; Lobato Carral, Clemente. Outstanding knowledge competences and web 2. 0 practices for developing successful e-learning project management. INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF PROJECT MANAGEMENT, 31(1), pp.14-21(2013).

DOI: 10.1016/j.ijproman.2012.08.002

[6] Huang, Shiu-Li; Shiu, Jung-Hung. A User-Centric Adaptive Learning System for E-Learning. EDUCATIONAL TECHNOLOGY & SOCIETY, 15(3), pp.214-225(2012).

[7] Chen, Yu-Chien; Hwang, Ren-Hung; Wang, Cheng-Yu. Development and evaluation of a Web 2. 0 annotation system as a learning tool in an e-learning environment. COMPUTERS & EDUCATION, 58(4), pp.1094-1105 (2012).

DOI: 10.1016/j.compedu.2011.12.017

[8] Martin, Marie. Web 2. 0-based e-learning. BRITISH JOURNAL OF EDUCATIONAL TECHNOLOGY, 42(6), p. E172-E173 (2011).

[9] Wang, Hei Chia; Chiu, Yi Fang. Assessing e-learning 2. 0 system success. COMPUTERS & EDUCATION, 57(2), pp.1790-1800(2011).

[10] Cristea, Alexandra I.; Ghali, Fawaz. Towards adaptation in e-learning 2. 0. NEW REVIEW OF HYPERMEDIA AND MULTIMEDIA, 17(2), pp.199-238(2011).

DOI: 10.1080/13614568.2010.541289

[11] Huang, Yueh-Min; Yang, Stephen J. H.; Tsai, Chin-Chung. Web 2. 0 for interactive e-learning. INTERACTIVE LEARNING ENVIRONMENTS, 17(4), pp.257-259 (2009).

DOI: 10.1080/10494820903195108

[12] Pena-Ayala, Alejandro; Sossa, Humberto; Mendez, Ignacio. Activity theory as a framework for building adaptive e-learning systems: A case to provide empirical evidence. COMPUTERS IN HUMAN BEHAVIOR, 30, pp.131-145(2014).

DOI: 10.1016/j.chb.2013.07.057

[13] Persico, Donatella; Manca, Stefania; Pozzi, Francesca. Adapting the Technology Acceptance Model to evaluate the innovative potential of e-learning systems. COMPUTERS IN HUMAN BEHAVIOR, 30, pp.614-622(2014).

DOI: 10.1016/j.chb.2013.07.045