Simulation of Final Cover Systems in Mitigating Landfill Gas Migration

Abstract:

Landfill cover systems have to serve as a hydraulic barrier as well as a gas barrier. The ability of multilayered cover systems to mitigate landfill gas migration was assessed. A finite element model, SEEP/W^®, was used to simulate the landfill cover system. It was found that gas advective flux through the single GCL barrier was highly dependent on the differential gas pressure across the cover system and the conditions of soils above the barrier layer. The change from wet to dry condition resulted in the increase of gas flux up to 3000 times. Gas flux variations were much lower for the case of a single CCL. The use of a geomembrane on top of a CCL or a GCL significantly increased the effectiveness of the barrier layer in mitigating gas migration, particularly in a dry climatic condition. Furthermore, the change of the cover conditions had less effect on gas flux through a composite cover system than gas flux through a single barrier cover system. For the effective control of landfill gas migration, the cover system must be maintained at the high moisture content conditions.

• Periodical: Applied Mechanics and Materials (Volumes 587-589)
• Pages: 886-891
• DOI: https://doi.org/10.4028/www.scientific.net/AMM.587-589.886
• Online since: July 2014
• Authors: Thaveesak Vangpaisal*
• Keywords: Compacted Clay Liner, Composite Liner, Cover Systems, Geomembrane, Geosynthetic Clay Liner, Landfill Gases

References

[1] R. Thiel,: Design of a Gas Pressure Relief Layer Below a Geomembrane Cover to Improve Slope Stability. Proc. Geo-synthetics'99, Boston, Massachusetts, IFAI. (1999), pp.235-251.

DOI: 10.1680/gein.5.0137

[2] M.T. Izadi and R.W. Stephenson: Measurement of Gas Permeability through Clay Soils. In: D.M. Nielsen and M.N. Sara (Editors), Current Practices in Ground Water and Vadose Zone Investigations; ASTM STP 1118. ASTM Publication, Philadelphia (1992).

DOI: 10.1520/stp19138s

[3] G. Didier, A. Bouazza and D. Cazaux: Gas Permeability of Geosynthetic Clay Liners. Geotextiles and Geomembranes, Vol. 18, No. 2 (2000), pp.235-250.

DOI: 10.1016/s0266-1144(99)00029-1

[4] T. Vangpaisal and A. Bouazza: Gas Permeability of Partially Hydrated Geosynthetic Clay Liners. J. Geotech. and Geoenv. Eng., ASCE, Vol. 130, No. 1 (2004), pp.93-102.

DOI: 10.1061/(asce)1090-0241(2004)130:1(93)

[5] A. Bouazza, J. Zornberg and D. Adams: Geosynthetics in Waste Containment Facilities; Recent Advances, Proc. 7th Int. Conference on Geosynthetics, France, A.A. Balkema (2002).

[6] A. Bouazza, T. Vangpaisal, H. Abuel-Naga and J. Kodikara: Analytical Modelling of Gas leakage Rate through a Geosynthetic Clay Liner–Geomembrane Composite Liner due to a Circular Defect in the Geomembrane. Geotextiles and Geomembranes, Vol. 26, No. 2 (2008).

DOI: 10.1016/j.geotexmem.2007.09.001

[7] GEO-SLOPE: SEEP/W Version 5 User's guide. Canada, GEO-SLOPE International Ltd. (2001).

[8] C. G. Kelln: A Gas Phase Tracer Technique for Measuring Porosity and Effective Coefficient of Diffusion in Unsaturated Porous Media. Master Thesis, University of Saskatchewan (2001).