Concrete Strength Variability in Italian RC Buildings: Analysis of a Large DataBase of Core Tests

Abstract:

The knowledge of the materials’ mechanical properties is a preliminary and important step in the seismic vulnerability assessment of existing buildings. In RC structures, the compressive strength of concrete can have a crucial role on the seismic performance and is usually difficult to estimate. Major seismic codes prescribe that concrete strength has to be determined essentially from in-situ and laboratory tests. In some cases such estimation can be complemented by default values in accordance to standards at the time of construction, therefore analysing the actual concrete properties typically found in RC existing buildings realized in different periods can make available useful data. To this end, in this paper attention has been addressed to public buildings, namely schools and hospitals. A large database made up of about 1500 test results on concrete cores extracted from about 300 RC public buildings located in Basilicata region (Italy), has been prepared and analysed. The relationships between the actual strength values (mean and dispersion) and the construction period of buildings have been studied. Theoretical distributions to approximate the discrete distributions of strength values in different construction periods have been determined, thus providing relevant data for the structural assessment of individual buildings and, especially, for large scale vulnerability evaluations.

• Periodical: Applied Mechanics and Materials (Volume 597)
• Pages: 283-290
• DOI: https://doi.org/10.4028/www.scientific.net/AMM.597.283
• Online since: July 2014
• Authors: Angelo Masi*, Andrea Digrisolo, Giuseppe Santarsiero
• Keywords: Concrete Cores, Existing Rc Buildings, In-Situ Concrete Strength

References

[1] P. Ricci, F. De Luca, GM. Verderame: 6th April 2009 L'Aquila earthquake, Italy: Reinforced concrete building performance. Bull Earthquake Eng (2011), 9(1): 285–305.

DOI: 10.1007/s10518-010-9204-8

[2] A. Masi, G. Santarsiero, M.R. Gallipoli, M. Mucciarelli, V. Manfredi, A. Dusi, T. A. Stabile: Performance of the health facilities during the 2012 Emilia (Italy) earthquake and analysis of the Mirandola hospital case study. Bull. Earthquake Eng (in press). DOI: 10. 1007/s10518-013-9518-4.

DOI: 10.1007/s10518-013-9518-4

[3] Ministerial Decree 14 January 2008: Technical Norms for Constructions, 2008, (in Italian).

[4] CEN: Eurocode 8: Design of structures for earthquake resistance, Part 3: Assessment and retrofitting of buildings. June 2004, Doc. CEN/TC250/SC8/N388B. Comité Européen de Normalisation, Bruxelles (2004).

[5] FEMA 356: Prestandard and commentary for the seismic rehabilitation of buildings. Federal Emergency Management Agency, Washington D.C., November (2000).

[6] H. Crowley, M. Colombi, B. Borzi, M. Faravelli, M. Onida, M. Lopez, D. Polli, F. Meroni, R. Pinho: A comparison of seismic risk maps for Italy. Bull Earthquake Eng. (2009) 7: 149-180 DOI 10. 1007/s10518-008-9100-7.

DOI: 10.1007/s10518-008-9100-7

[7] INGV-DPC S1: Continued assistance to the DPC for the completion and management of seismic hazard maps foreseen in the Ordinance PCM 3274 and planning of future developments. http: /esse1. mi. ingv. it (in Italian) (2007).

[8] M. Stucchi, C. Meletti, V. Mondaldo, H. Crowley, G.M. Calvi, E. Boschi: Seismic Hazard Assessment (2003-2009) for the Italian Building Code. Bull. Seismol. Soc. Am. (2011) 101(4), 1885-(1911).

DOI: 10.1785/0120100130

[9] G.M. Verderame, G. Manfredi, G. Frunzio: Le proprietà meccaniche dei calcestruzzi impiegati nelle strutture in c. a. realizzate negli anni 60. In: Proceedings of the 10th Conference on "Earthquake Engineering in Italy, Potenza-Matera, 9-13 September 2001, (in Italian).

[10] G.M. Verderame, A. Stella, E. Cosenza: Le proprietà meccaniche degli acciai impiegati nelle strutture in cemento armato realizzate negli anni 60. In: Proc. of the 10th Conference on "Earthquake Engineering in Italy, Potenza-Matera, 9-13 September 2001, (in Italian).

[11] M. Ferrini, N. Signorini, P. Pelliccia, F. Pistola, V. Prestifilippo, G. Sabia: La metodologia della Regione Toscana per la valutazione della resistenza del calcestruzzo di edifici esistenti in cemento armato. In: Proc. of the Conference Valutazione e riduzione della vulnerabilità sismica di edifici in cemento armato, Roma, 2008, (in Italian).

DOI: 10.36253/bsgi-1453

[12] M. Ferrini, N. Signorini, P. Pelliccia, F. Pistola, V. Prestifilippo, G. Sabia: Risultati delle campagne d'indagine svolte dalla Regione Toscana per la valutazione della resistenza del calcestruzzo di edifici esistenti in cemento armato. In: Proc. of the conference Valutazione e riduzione della vulnerabilità sismica di edifici in cemento armato, Roma, 2008, (in Italian).

DOI: 10.36253/bsgi-1453

[13] A. Masi, M. Vona: Estimation of the in-situ concrete strength: provisions of the European and Italian seismic codes and possible improvements. In: Proc. of the Workshop Eurocode 8 Perspectives from the Italian Standpoint, (E. Cosenza Ed. ), 67-77, 2009, Naples, Italy.

[14] OPCM 3431 3 May 2005: Further modifications and integrations of the OPCM 3274 of the 20 March 2003, 2005, (in Italian).

[15] A. Masi, L. Chiauzzi: An experimental study on the within-member variability of in situ concrete strength in RC building structures. Construction and Building Materials. 47: 951-961. (2013).

DOI: 10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2013.05.102

[16] FEMA 274: NEHRP commentary on the guidelines for the seismic rehabilitation of buildings. Federal Emergency Management Agency, 1997. Washington, D. C.

[17] Royal Decree n. 2229: Design code of reinforced concrete structures, 1939, (in Italian).

[18] Ministerial Decree 30 May 1972: Design code of reinforced concrete, prestressed concrete and steel structures, 1972, (in Italian).

[19] Ang A.H.S., Tang W.H.: Probability Concepts in Engineering (2nd Edition), John Wiley & Sons, (2007).