Switching Control Blending Methodology with Single Parameter Dependent and its Application to Tiltrotor

Article Preview

Abstract:

Because direct switching between controllers will generate abrupt change of control signal causing severe actuators workload, a switching control blending methodology is presented in this paper. By the blending of weighted multi-controllers output signals in which the weight value depends on a single switching parameter, the control signals can be switched smoothly and the closed-loop dynamic acts continuously. In this method, the design of multi-controllers can use any available methods while the closed-loop switching stability is insured by rational division of closed-loop state-space along the switching parameter. The closed-loop switching stability under control blending is presented, and a state-space division algorithm is developed. With the application to the tiltrotor, the simulation results show that the presented control methodology can provide all modes control ability and make control signals switched smoothly.

You might also be interested in these eBooks

Info:

Periodical:

Pages:

1015-1018

Citation:

Online since:

August 2014

Export:

Price:

Permissions CCC:

Permissions PLS:

Сopyright:

© 2014 Trans Tech Publications Ltd. All Rights Reserved

Share:

Citation:

* - Corresponding Author

[1] Wen Bao, Yiwen Qi, Daren Yu, Zhaohui Yao, Jun Zhao: International Journal of Innovative Computing, Information and Control, Vol. 8 (2012), pp.677-689.

Google Scholar

[2] Joseph J. Yamé, Hanping Qiao, Michel Kinnaert: Conference on Control and Fault Tolerant Systems, (2010), pp.528-533.

Google Scholar

[3] Mincho Hadjiski, Ventsislav Asenov: Cybernetics and Information Technologies, Vol. 5 (2005), pp.32-41.

Google Scholar

[4] Matthew Kuipers and Petros Ioannou: IEEE Transactions on Automatic Control, Vol. 55 (2010), pp.1822-1836.

Google Scholar

[5] Simone Baldi, Petros A. Ioannou and Elias B. Kosmatopoulos: International Journal of Adaptive Control and Signal Processing, Vol. 0 (2011), p.1–21.

Google Scholar

[6] Nabil Aouf, Declan G. Bates, Ian Postlethwaite, Benoit Boulet: Control Engineering Practice, Vol. 10 (2002), p: 685–696.

DOI: 10.1016/s0967-0661(02)00028-x

Google Scholar

[7] Da-Wei Ding and Guang-Hong Yang: American Control Conference, (2008).

Google Scholar

[8] A. Fujimori, M. Kurozumi, P. N. Nikiforuk, M. M. Gupta: AIAA-99-4057, pp.583-592.

Google Scholar

[9] Atsushi Fujimori, Kyohei Miura: SICE Annual Conference, (2007), pp.2258-2263.

DOI: 10.1109/sice.2007.4421364

Google Scholar

[10] Brandon Hencey, Andrew G. Alleyne: IEEE Transactions on Control Systems Technology, Vol. 18(2010), pp.1-10.

Google Scholar

[11] Antonio Marullo, Lorenzo Pollini, Fabrizio Giulietti and Mario Innocenti: proceeding of the American control conference, (2001), pp.4777-4781.

Google Scholar