Screw Fixing Fracture and Fatigue Failure on Particleboard Surface Using Different Style of Screw Insertion Technique

Article Preview

Abstract:

Particleboard jointing during screw fixing activities weakens the furniture, kitchen and household joinery. Screw jointing on the particleboard surface contribute to the particleboard fracture. Fracture on the particleboard surface will promote failure in jointing. This study was done to determine the effect of applying different style of screw insertion technique on fracture and fatigue failure. Three different style of screw insertion technique applied was self-drilling, pilot-hole and pilot-hole with countersunk (P+CSK) insertion technique. From the study, applications of P+CSK screw insertion technique caused highest number of damages. 57% of common chipboard screw samples were damaged when P+CSK screw insertion technique was used. Most fracture failure is the type 6 mode. There is no significance difference in number of damages for self-drilling insertion technique and pilot-hole insertion technique. Therefore, self-drilling insertion technique, which is the insertion technique used by kitchen cabinet installer was preferable due to the ease of handling during screw insertion.

You might also be interested in these eBooks

Info:

Periodical:

Pages:

454-457

Citation:

Online since:

July 2014

Export:

Price:

Permissions CCC:

Permissions PLS:

Сopyright:

© 2014 Trans Tech Publications Ltd. All Rights Reserved

Share:

Citation:

* - Corresponding Author

[1] Anderson P, 2007, Making fine furniture; perfect results with power tools, New York.

Google Scholar

[2] Anonymous, 2004, Particleboard, Panel guide (V3) Annex2A.

Google Scholar

[3] The laminex group, 2001, Particleboard- the tradesman's essential guide.

Google Scholar

[4] The European Standard, BS ISO 1891: 2009, Fasteners – Terminology.

Google Scholar

[5] Özçifçi A, 2009 The effects of pilot hole, screw types and layer thickness on the withdrawal strength of screw in laminated veneer lumber, Materials and Design, 30, pp.2355-2358.

DOI: 10.1016/j.matdes.2008.11.001

Google Scholar

[6] Park H. J, Semple K, Smith G. D, 2006, Screw thread shape and fastener type effects on load capacities of screw-based particleboard joints in case construction, Forest product journal.

Google Scholar

[7] The European Standard, BS EN 312: 2003, Particleboard – Specifications.

Google Scholar

[8] The European Standard, BS EN 320: 1993, Fiberboard – Determination of resistance to axial withdrawal of screws.

Google Scholar

[9] Abu. F and Ahmad. M, 2011, Screw Fixing Damages and Screw-holding Performance in Particleboard Exposed to the Kitchen Environment in the Selected Area of Kuala Lumpur and Selangor, 3rd International Symposium & Exhibition in Sustainable Energy & Environment (ISESEE), 978-1-4577-0340-9 pp.227-232.

DOI: 10.1109/isesee.2011.5977094

Google Scholar

[10] Abu. F and Ahmad. M, 2011, Physical Properties of Particleboard Exposed to the Kitchen Environment in Selected Areas of Kuala Lumpur and Selangor, IEEE Symposium on Business, Engineering and Applications (ISBEIA), 978-1-4577-1549-5 pp.204-207.

DOI: 10.1109/isbeia.2011.6088805

Google Scholar

[11] Abu. F and Ahmad. M, 2012, Assessment on Screw Fixing Failure Mode for Kitchen Cabinet Particleboard, Advanced Materials Research Vols. 463-464 pp.577-581.

DOI: 10.4028/www.scientific.net/amr.463-464.577

Google Scholar

[12] Gates J. C, 2009. Screw Withdrawal Strength in 9's Wood Assemblies, Oregon Wood Innovation Center.

Google Scholar

[13] Jackson A, Day D, Jennings S, 2003, 7th printings, The complete manual of woodworking.

Google Scholar

[14] Blandford P. W, 1976, the woodworkers' bible: a complete guide to woodworking, New York.

Google Scholar

[15] Customwood- Handling and installation, Retrieve on March 29, 2011 form http: /www. daiken-nz. com.

Google Scholar