Degradable Scaffold Microstructure of Artificial Bioactive Bone Fabricated by 3D Braiding Method

Article Preview

Abstract:

A novel fabrication of degradable scaffold is presented by using several biomaterials and growth factor (GF). Chitosan fibers can be braided into the internal fiber microstructure of the scaffold by a three-dimensional braiding (3DB) method, and rapid prototype & rapid tools techniques can be used to rapidly fabricate the outer shape mold of the scaffold. The scaffolds with 3D fiber architecture had obviously accelerated bone regeneration in comparison with the control. In detail, the materials biodegraded inside and outside and the bone ingrowth first occurred along the chitosan fibers in the scaffold. In summary, the method in this paper not only can be easily shaped but also cannot change the bio-properties of materials and GF since it does not need high temperature sintering and not produce heat, so the actions of the several biomaterials for bone regeneration interacted simultaneously through the interconnectivity macrochannels in the in-vivo scaffolds, which left by the biodegradation of the internal fiber.

You might also be interested in these eBooks

Info:

Periodical:

Pages:

980-983

Citation:

Online since:

August 2014

Authors:

Export:

Price:

Permissions CCC:

Permissions PLS:

Сopyright:

© 2014 Trans Tech Publications Ltd. All Rights Reserved

Share:

Citation:

* - Corresponding Author

[1] Yoshikawa T. Bone reconstruction by cultured bone graft . Materials Science and Engineering C, 2000, 13: 29 - 37.

DOI: 10.1016/s0928-4931(00)00173-9

Google Scholar

[2] Cooke MN, Fisher JP, Dean D, et al. Use of stereo lithography to manufacture critical2sized 3D biodegradable scaffolds for bone ingrowths. Biomaterial Research Part B: 2002, 64B: 65 - 69.

Google Scholar

[3] Hollister SJ, Maddox RD, Taboas JM. Optimal design and fabrication of scaffolds to mimmic tissue properties and satisfy biological constraints. Biomaterials, 2002, 23: 4095 - 4103.

DOI: 10.1016/s0142-9612(02)00148-5

Google Scholar

[4] Taboas JM, Maddox RD, Krebsbach PH, et al. Indirect solid free form fabrication of local and global porous, biomimetic and composite 3D polymer2ceramic scaffolds. Biomaterials, 2003, 24: 181 - 194.

DOI: 10.1016/s0142-9612(02)00276-4

Google Scholar

[5] Kalita SJ, Bosc S, Hosick HL, et al. Development of controlled porosity polymer2ceramic composite scaffolds via fused deposition modeling. Materials Science and Engineering C, 2003, 23: 611 -620.

DOI: 10.1016/s0928-4931(03)00052-3

Google Scholar

[6] Gabriel CTM, David GO, Scott J H, et al. Mechanical and in vivo performance of hydroxyapatite implant with controlled architectures. Biomaterials, 2002, 23: 1283 - 1293.

Google Scholar

[7] Dietmar WH. Scaffolds in tissue engineering bone and cartilage. Biomaterials, 2000, 21: 2592 - 2543.

Google Scholar

[8] Aaron WP, Jeffrey WR, Phillip BM. Thermal assembly of a biomimetic mineralPcollagen composite. Biomaterials, 2003, 24: 4881 - 4890.

Google Scholar

[9] Lacout JL, Mejdoub E, Hamad M. Crystallization mechanical of calcium phosphate cement for biological uses. Material Science, 1996, 7: 371 - 376.

Google Scholar

[10] Yuan H, Li Y, de Bruijn J D, et al. Tissue response of calcium phosphate cement: a study in dogs. Biomaterials, 2000, 21: 1283 - 1290.

DOI: 10.1016/s0142-9612(00)00016-8

Google Scholar