Developments in Mercury Removal from Natural Gas - A Short Review

Article Preview

Abstract:

Almost all hydrocarbons contain mercury up to different levels depending upon the locality and region. In the case of natural gas and natural gas liquids, it is likely to be present as elemental mercury. However in crude oil, it may also be present as organo-metallic and ionic mercury. The presence of mercury in refinery hydrocarbon streams not only results in detrimental effects, including catalyst poisoning, corrosion, safety issues but also anthropogenic increase of mercury level in environment which has provoked the search for environmental friendly techniques to capture the mercury from process streams. In this paper, the available techniques, current limitations and future prospects for mercury removal from natural gas are discussed.

You might also be interested in these eBooks

Info:

Periodical:

Pages:

223-228

Citation:

Online since:

September 2014

Export:

Price:

Permissions CCC:

Permissions PLS:

Сopyright:

© 2014 Trans Tech Publications Ltd. All Rights Reserved

Share:

Citation:

* - Corresponding Author

[1] Wilhelm, S.M. and N. Bloom, Mercury in petroleum. Fuel Processing Technology, 2000. 63(1): pp.1-27.

Google Scholar

[2] Zettlizer, M., Scholer, H. F., Eiden, R. and Falter, R, Distribution of Elemental, Inorganic and Organic Mercury in North German Gas Condensates and Formation Brines, in International Symposium on Oilfield Chemistry, 1997, Society of Petroleum Engineers: Houston, Texas.

DOI: 10.2118/37260-ms

Google Scholar

[3] M. Abu El Ela, I.S.M., M.H. Nabawi and M. Abdel Azim, Mercury Monitoring and Removal at Gas-Processing Facilities: Case Study of Salam Gas Plant. SPE Projects, Facilities & Construction, 2008. 3(1): pp.1-9.

DOI: 10.2118/106900-pa

Google Scholar

[4] M. Abu El Ela, M.H.N. a.M.A.A., Behavior of the Mercury Removal Absorbents at Egyptian Gas Plant, in CIPC/SPE Gas Technology Symposium 2008 Joint Conference2008, Society of Petroleum Engineers: Calgary, Alberta, Canada.

DOI: 10.2118/114521-ms

Google Scholar

[5] O'Dowd, W.J., et al., A technique to control mercury from flue gas: The Thief Process. Fuel Processing Technology, 2006. 87(12): pp.1071-1084.

DOI: 10.1016/j.fuproc.2006.05.006

Google Scholar

[6] Zheng, Y., et al., Review of technologies for mercury removal from flue gas from cement production processes. Progress in Energy and Combustion Science, 2012. 38(5): pp.599-629.

DOI: 10.1016/j.pecs.2012.05.001

Google Scholar

[7] Mahpuzah Abai, M.P.A., Amiruddin Hassan, Mercury removal from gas streams using new solid adsorbents, in International Gas Union Research Conference2011.

Google Scholar

[8] Zhao, Q. and J.L. Anderson, Ionic Liquids, in Comprehensive Sampling and Sample Preparation, P. Editor-in-Chief: Janusz, Editor. 2012, Academic Press: Oxford. pp.213-242.

DOI: 10.1016/b978-0-12-381373-2.00053-3

Google Scholar

[9] Sowmiah, S., et al., On the Chemical Stabilities of Ionic Liquids. Molecules, 2009. 14(9): pp.3780-3813.

DOI: 10.3390/molecules14093780

Google Scholar

[10] Malik, M.A., M.A. Hashim, and F. Nabi, Ionic liquids in supported liquid membrane technology. Chemical Engineering Journal, 2011. 171(1): pp.242-254.

DOI: 10.1016/j.cej.2011.03.041

Google Scholar

[11] Lothongkum, A.W., et al., Simultaneous removal of arsenic and mercury from natural-gas-co-produced water from the Gulf of Thailand using synergistic extractant via HFSLM. Journal of Membrane Science, 2011. 369(1–2): pp.350-358.

DOI: 10.1016/j.memsci.2010.12.013

Google Scholar

[12] Ji, L., M. Abu-Daabes, and N.G. Pinto, Thermally robust chelating adsorbents for the capture of gaseous mercury: Fixed-bed behavior. Chemical Engineering Science, 2009. 64(3): pp.486-491.

DOI: 10.1016/j.ces.2008.09.012

Google Scholar

[13] Abu-Daabes, M., Synthesis and characterization of a nano-structured chelating adsorbents for the direct removal of mercury vapor from flue gases, in Chemical Engineering2005, University of Cincinnati.

DOI: 10.1016/j.ces.2004.11.028

Google Scholar

[14] J. Markovs, y., Purification of Fluid Streams Containing Mercury, 1988: U.S. Patent.

Google Scholar

[15] MANOCHA, S.M., Porous carbons. Sadhana, 2003. 28(1 & 2): pp.335-348.

Google Scholar

[16] Yeo, Z.Y., et al., Conventional processes and membrane technology for carbon dioxide removal from natural gas: A review. Journal of Natural Gas Chemistry, 2012. 21(3): pp.282-298.

DOI: 10.1016/s1003-9953(11)60366-6

Google Scholar

[17] Vidic, R.D., Control of Mercury Emissions in Flue Gases by Activated Carbon Adsorption. PREPRINTS OF PAPERS-AMERICAN CHEMICAL SOCIETY DIVISION FUEL CHEMISTRY, 1996. 41: pp.437-441.

Google Scholar

[18] Hongqun Yang, Z.X., Maohong Fan, Alan E. Bland, Roddie R. Judkins, Adsorbents for capturing mercury in coal-fired boiler flue gas. Journal of Hazardous Materials, 2007. 146: pp.1-11.

DOI: 10.1016/j.jhazmat.2007.04.113

Google Scholar

[19] Villa, Florentino LA and Sugier., Process for Removing Mercury from Gas or a Liquid by Absorption on a Copper Sulfide Containing Solid Mass. U.S. Patent No. 4, 094, 777. 13 Jun. (1978).

Google Scholar

[20] Shafawi, A., et al., Preliminary evaluation of adsorbent-based mercury removal systems for gas condensate. Analytica Chimica Acta, 2000. 415(1–2): pp.21-32.

DOI: 10.1016/s0003-2670(00)00838-2

Google Scholar

[21] Wilhelm, S.M., Mercury in petroleum and natural gas: estimation of emissions from production, processing, and combustion, (2011).

Google Scholar

[22] Terrigeol, A., Molecular sieves in gas processing: Effects and consequences by contaminants. HydrocarbonProcessing, 2013(January): pp.51-56.

Google Scholar

[23] Fontanals, N., F. Borrull, and R.M. Marcé, Ionic liquids in solid-phase extraction. TrAC Trends in Analytical Chemistry, 2012. 41(0): pp.15-26.

DOI: 10.1016/j.trac.2012.08.010

Google Scholar

[24] Welton, T., Room-temperature ionic liquids. Solvents for synthesis and catalysis. Chem. Rev., 1999. 99: p.2071-(2084).

DOI: 10.1021/cr980032t

Google Scholar

[25] Holbrey, J.D.S., K.R. , Ionic liquids. . Clean Technol. Environ. Policy, 1999: pp.223-236.

Google Scholar

[26] Seddon, K.R., Ionic liquids for clean technology. J. Chem. Tech. Biotech, 1997. 68: pp.351-356.

Google Scholar

[27] Ji, L., S. Thiel, and N. Pinto, Pyrrolidinium Imides: Promising Ionic Liquids for Direct Capture of Elemental Mercury from Flue Gas. Water, Air, & Soil Pollution: Focus, 2008. 8(3-4): pp.349-358.

DOI: 10.1007/s11267-007-9144-8

Google Scholar

[28] Ji, L., S.W. Thiel, and N.G. Pinto, Room Temperature Ionic Liquids for Mercury Capture from Flue Gas. Industrial & Engineering Chemistry Research, 2008. 47(21): pp.8396-8400.

DOI: 10.1021/ie8008023

Google Scholar

[29] Selvam, T., A. Machoke, and W. Schwieger, Supported ionic liquids on non-porous and porous inorganic materials—A topical review. Applied Catalysis A: General, 2012. 445–446(0): pp.92-101.

DOI: 10.1016/j.apcata.2012.08.007

Google Scholar

[30] Lemus, J., et al., Characterization of Supported Ionic Liquid Phase (SILP) materials prepared from different supports. Adsorption, 2011. 17(3): pp.561-571.

DOI: 10.1007/s10450-011-9327-5

Google Scholar

[31] ZHU LiLi, G.L., ZHANG ZhenJiang, CHEN Ji, ZHANG ShaoMin, The preparation of supported ionic liquids (SILs) and their application in rare metals separation. Science China Chemistry, 2012. 55(8): pp.1479-1487.

DOI: 10.1007/s11426-012-4632-8

Google Scholar

[32] Mahpuzah Abai, M.P.A., Kuah Yong Cheun, John Holbrey, Peter Nockemann, Kenneth Seddon, Geetha Srinivasan, Yiran Zou, Process for removing metals from hydrocarbons, 2012: UK.

Google Scholar