HTHL Space Vehicles: Concepts and Control Problems

Abstract:

Integrated launch systems that include aerospace plane (ASP) and another heavy winged vehicle (plane or better Wing-in-Ground effect vehicle) as a booster are reviewed. It is shown that WIG-vehicle with a mass of 1500 ton or more is capable to carry ASP with initial mass of 500 ton and landing mass of 60-70 ton. Ekranoplane can provide ASP with the primary speed of Mach 0.5-0.65 in the required direction that allows lowering the design requirements to ASP's wing area and engines. A number of other advantages from the offered transport system are linked to possible use of WIG-vehicle at ASP landing. Heavy WIG-vehicle is unique vehicle for realizing the progressive idea of docking to descending ASP, allowing expanding opportunities of its landing. The problem of ASP horizontal landing without undercarriage by docking with other flying vehicle at the last stage of decent and the requirements to control systems for relative motion control of both vehicles are discussed. The progressive idea of joining space launch technologies with marine technologies is developed. It is especially important for countries with strongly limited areas of land territory but with easy access to the ocean.

• Periodical: Applied Mechanics and Materials (Volume 629)
• Pages: 382-387
• DOI: https://doi.org/10.4028/www.scientific.net/AMM.629.382
• Online since: October 2014
• Authors: Alexander Nebylov*
• Keywords: Aerospace Plane, Docking of Two Winged Vehicles, Horizontal Landing, Horizontal take Off, Payload Injection to Orbit, Relative Motion Control, Space Launch, Specific Cost, Wing-in-Ground Effect Vehicle

References

[1] Report of the Horizontal Launch Study. Darpa, USA, (2011), 70 p. http: /ntrs. nasa. gov/archive/nasa/casi. ntrs. nasa. gov/20110015353. pdf.

[2] D. Ashford. Space Exploration – All That Matters. Hodder, 2013, 160 p.

[3] R,M. Swanson. NASA Solicitation: Horizontal Launch Study. NASA's Dryden Flight Research Center (presently the Armstrong Flight Research Center), September, (2010), http: /www. spaceref. com/news/viewsr. html?pid=34939.

DOI: 10.2514/6.1995-3419

[4] N. Tomita, A.V. Nebylov, V.V. Sokolov, Y. Ohkami. Performance and Technological Feasibility of Rocket Powered HTHL-SSTO with Take-off Assist (Aerospace Plane/Ekranoplane), Acta Astronautica, Vol. 45, No. 10, 1999, pp.629-637.

DOI: 10.1016/s0094-5765(99)00116-2

[5] N. Tomita, , Y. Ohkami. A study on the application of take-off assist for a SSTO with rocket propulsion. IAF-95-V. 3. 06. (1995).

[6] A.V. Nebylov Principles and systems of heavy WIG-craft flight control. Proceedings of 18th IFAC Symposium on Automatic Control in aerospace. Nara, Japan, (2010).

DOI: 10.3182/20100906-5-jp-2022.00019

[7] А.V. Nebylov, V.А. Nebylov. WIG-Craft Marine Landing Control at Rough Sea. Proceedings of the 17th IFAC World Congress. Seoul, Korea, . (2008), pp.1070-1075.

DOI: 10.3182/20080706-5-kr-1001.00185

[8] A.V. Nebylov, V.A. Nebylov. Control Strategies of Spaceplane Docking and Undocking with Other Winged Vehicle. 18th IFAC World Congress, Milano, Italy, 2011, pp.2109-2114.

DOI: 10.3182/20110828-6-it-1002.02582

[9] A.V. Nebylov, N. Tomita. Control aspects of aerospace plane docking with ekranoplane for water landing. 14th IFAC Symposium on Automatic Control in Aerospace. 1998, pp.389-394.

DOI: 10.1016/s1474-6670(17)41106-2

[10] G.K. Taylor. A Practical Guide to Building Ekranoplan (WIG) Models. Proceedings of the EuroAvia Ground Effect Symposium - EAGES, Toulouse; (2001), pp.145-161.

[11] L. Yun, A. Bliault, Doo J. WIG Craft and Ekranoplan: Ground Effect Craft Technology. Springer-Verlag New York Inc. 2010, 441 p.

DOI: 10.1007/978-1-4419-0042-5_1

[12] A.V. Nebylov, editor. Aerospace Sensors. Momentum Press, NY, 2013, 350p.

[13] A.V. Nebylov, P. Wilson. Ekranoplane - Controlled Flight close to Surface. Monograph. WIT-Press, UK, 2002, 320 p.

[14] A.V. Nebylov. Ensuring control accuracy. Lecture Notes in Control and Information Sciences, 305, Springer-Verlag, Heidelberg, Germany, 2004, 240 p.