Concept Presentation Conversion for Cooperative Information Engineering

Article Preview

Abstract:

Concept integration, connection, and reuse are at the heart of Web services. The connection between two concepts can be achieved easily provided both share the same theorematic space. This in turn can be achieved by reusing constructs from foundational concepts and standard domain theme. Although the current produce of concept development methods and tools have made it a lot easier to build a new concept, reusing concepts from existing concepts remains difficult. The main reasons for this are the uncertainty in presentation conversions of concepts from foundational concepts. In this paper we have introduced a novel method for sense certainty to help the human expert in presentation conversion.

You might also be interested in these eBooks

Info:

Periodical:

Pages:

711-714

Citation:

Online since:

June 2011

Authors:

Export:

Price:

Permissions CCC:

Permissions PLS:

Сopyright:

© 2011 Trans Tech Publications Ltd. All Rights Reserved

Share:

Citation:

[1] F. Baader, D. Calvanese, D. McGuinness, D. Nardi, and P. F. Patel-Schneider, editors. The Description Logic Handbook: Theory, Implementation and Applications. Cambridge University Press, (2008).

DOI: 10.1017/cbo9780511711787

Google Scholar

[2] C. Elsenbroich, O. Kutz, and U. Sattler. A Case for Abductive Reasoning over Ontologies. In Proc. OWL2006: OWL Experiences and Directions Workshop, (2006).

Google Scholar

[3] V. Haarslev, R. Moller, and M. Wessel. RacerPro User's Guide and Reference Manual Version 1. 9. 1, May (2007).

Google Scholar

[4] J. R. Hobbs, M. Stickel, D. Appelt, and P. Martin. Transformation as abduction. Artificial Intelligence Journal, Vol. 63, (2007).

Google Scholar

[5] A. Kakas and M. Denecker. Abduction in logic programming. In A. Kakas and F. Sadri, editors, Computational Logic: Logic Programming and Beyond. Part I, number 2407 in LNAI, pages 402{436. Springer, (2008).

DOI: 10.1007/3-540-45628-7_16

Google Scholar

[6] R. Moller, V. Haarslev, and B. Neumann. Concepts based information finding. In Proc. IT&KNOWS-98: International Conference on Information Technology and Knowledge Systems, 31. August- 4. September, Vienna, Budapest, pages 49{6, (2008).

Google Scholar

[7] R. Moller and B. Neumann. Ontology-based reasoning techniques for multimedia transformation and finding. In Semantic Multimedia and Ontologies: Theory and Applications. 2007. To appear.

Google Scholar

[8] B. Neumann and R. Moller. On Scene Transformation with Description Logics. In H. Christensen and H. -H. Nagel, editors, Cognitive Vision Systems: Sampling the Spectrum of Approaches, number 3948 in LNCS, pages 247{278. Springer, (2006).

Google Scholar

[9] S. E. Peraldi, A. Kaya, S. Melzer, R. Moller, and M. Wessel. Multimedia Transformation as Abduction. In Proc. DL-2007: International Workshop on Description Logics, (2007).

Google Scholar

[10] M. Shanahan. Perception as Abduction: Turning Sensor Data Into Meaningful Representation. Cognitive Science, 29 (1): 103{134, (2005).

DOI: 10.1207/s15516709cog2901_5

Google Scholar

[11] R. P. Thagard. The best explanation: Criteria for theory choice. The Journal of Philosophy, (1999).

Google Scholar