Risk Assessment of Cascading Failure Considering Adverse Weather Condition and UPFC Corrective Control

Article Preview

Abstract:

This paper investigates the effect of Unified Power Flow Controller (UPFC) on the risk of cascading failure which resulted from adverse weather based on the risk-based security assessment (RBSA) method. An improved piecewise probability model is described to reflect the impact of adverse weather condition and overloads. Based on power-injection model of UPFC, an optimal power flow control strategy is integrated into the RBSA procedure to relieve the risk of cascading failure caused by initiating event. Furthermore, a sensitivity based approach is adopted to determine the optimal location of UPFC. The effectiveness of the proposed method has been tested on IEEE RTS-79 system.

You might also be interested in these eBooks

Info:

Periodical:

Pages:

718-722

Citation:

Online since:

September 2014

Export:

Price:

Permissions CCC:

Permissions PLS:

Сopyright:

© 2014 Trans Tech Publications Ltd. All Rights Reserved

Share:

Citation:

* - Corresponding Author

[1] US-Canada Power System Outage Task Force. Final report on the August 14, 2003 blackout in the United States and Canada: causes and recommendation[R/OL]. Canada, 2004. https: /reports. energy. gov.

Google Scholar

[2] Dobson I,Carreras B A,Newman D E.A probabilistic loading-dependent model of cascading failure and possible implications for blackouts. Proceedings of the 36th Annual Hawaii International Conference on Systems Sciences.Maui,USA:IEEE,2003:10-19.

DOI: 10.1109/hicss.2003.1173909

Google Scholar

[3] Abou El Ela, A. A., A. Z. El-Din. Optimal corrective actions for power systems using multiobjective genetic algorithms. Universities Power Engineering Conference, 2007. UPEC 2007. 42nd International, (2007).

DOI: 10.1109/upec.2007.4468975

Google Scholar

[4] Ma, K., et al., Risk and reliability worth assessment of power systems under corrective control. 2009, IEEE. pp.1-6.

Google Scholar

[5] Youbo Liu, Bin Hu, et al. Power system cascading failure analysis theories and application I— related theories and applications[J]. Power System Protection and Control, 2013(09): 148-155. (in Chinese).

Google Scholar

[6] M. Ni, J. D. McCalley, V. Vittal, T. Tayyib, Online risk-based security assessment, IEEE Trans. Power Systems, vol. 18, pp.258-265, Feb. (2003).

DOI: 10.1109/tpwrs.2002.807091

Google Scholar

[7] Forrest D W,Albrecht P F,Allan R N,et al.Proposed terms for reporting and anlyzing outages of electrical transmission and distribution facilities.IEEE Transactions on Power Apparatus and Systems,1985,PAS-104(2):337-348.

DOI: 10.1109/tpas.1985.319048

Google Scholar

[8] Y.F. Wen, Y Wang, et al. Risk-oriented preventive control of transmission lines overload. Power and Energy Society General Meeting, 2012, IEEE. pp.1-7.

DOI: 10.1109/pesgm.2012.6343979

Google Scholar

[9] Wood AJ, Wollenberg BF. Power generation. Operation and control. New York: John Wiley; (1996).

Google Scholar

[10] Ying Xiao, Y.H. Song, Y.Z. Sun. Power Flow Control Approach to Power Systems With Embedded FACTS Devices. IEEE Transactions on Power Systems. 2002, 17(4): 943-949.

DOI: 10.1109/tpwrs.2002.804919

Google Scholar

[11] LI Li, LU Zongxiang, ZHOU Shuangxi. Research on the effect of typical FACTS devices on cascading failure risk. Power System Protection and Control. 2012, 40(3): 1-7.

Google Scholar

[12] Reliability Test System Task Force. IEEE reliability test system. IEEE Trans on PAS, 1979, 98(6): 2047-(2054).

DOI: 10.1109/tpas.1979.319398

Google Scholar