Analysis of Distribution Characteristics and Reliability for Bearing Capacity of Piles

Article Preview

Abstract:

This paper aims to study the distribution characteristics of the ratio of measured value and calculated value for ultimate bearing capacity, shaft resistance and tip resistance, and discuss the impact of shaft resistance and tip resistance on ultimate bearing capacity. A new performance function is proposed in terms of the three types of bearing capacity mentioned ahead. Take bored piles and driven piles for example, and the results from analysis indicate that the ratio of the measured value to calculated value of bored piles ranges from 0.75 to 1.45, and mostly is greater than 1.0; The ratio of the measured to predicted bearing capacity of driven piles lies between 0.8 and 1.5, and is larger than the corresponding ratio of bored piles. In addition, the reliability of tip resistance is lager than that of shaft resistance for bored pile, while the reliability of tip resistance is less than that of shaft resistance for driven piles. Meanwhile, the method presented in this paper can offer references to designers for revising and improving the technical code for pile foundations.

You might also be interested in these eBooks

Info:

Periodical:

Pages:

365-369

Citation:

Online since:

September 2014

Export:

Price:

Permissions CCC:

Permissions PLS:

Сopyright:

© 2014 Trans Tech Publications Ltd. All Rights Reserved

Share:

Citation:

* - Corresponding Author

[1] Han. L ( 2007) . Wave equation analysis and design method of driven pile for BOHAI drilled platform engineering[Doctor Degree Dissertation]. Beijing: China university of Geosciences.

Google Scholar

[2] Poulos. H. G., Davis. E. H(1980). Pile Foundation Analysis and Design[M]. New York: Wiley.

Google Scholar

[3] Bea. R. G., Jin. Z., Valle. C, et al(1999). Evaluation of reliability of platform pile foundation[J]. Journal of Geotechnical and Geoenvironmental Engineering, 125(8): 696-704.

DOI: 10.1061/(asce)1090-0241(1999)125:8(696)

Google Scholar

[4] Tang W H(1989). Uncertainties in offshore axial pile capacity[C]. Foundation Engineering, ASCE, 833-847.

Google Scholar

[5] Li D Q, Tang W H, Zhang L M(2008). Updating occurrence probability and size of defect for bored piles[J]. Structural Safety, 30(2): 130-143.

DOI: 10.1016/j.strusafe.2006.09.002

Google Scholar

[6] LINKINS. G. (2004). Pile testing selection and economy of safety factors[C]. Current Practices and Future Trends in Deep Foundations. Geotechnical Special Publication, ASCE, 239-252.

DOI: 10.1061/40743(142)14

Google Scholar

[7] Luo. S. X. (2004). Research and engineering application on probability limit states design method of pile foundation[Doctor Degree Dissertation]. Chengdu: Southwest Jiaotong University.

Google Scholar

[8] Kwak K, Kim J K, Huh, et al(2010). Reliability-based calibration of resistance factors for static bearing capacity of driven steel pipe piles[J]. Canadian Geotechnical Journal, 47(5): 528-538.

DOI: 10.1139/t09-119

Google Scholar

[9] Dithide M, Phoon K K, Wet D M, et al(2010). Characterization of model uncertainty in the static pile design formula[J]. Journal of Geotechnical and Geoenvironmental Engineering, 137(1): 70-85.

DOI: 10.1061/(asce)gt.1943-5606.0000401

Google Scholar

[10] Zhao X M, Wang X W, et al(2008). Reliability analysis of vertical bearing capacity of PHC piles at north bank of Yangtze River, Nanjing[J]. Rock and Soil Mechanics, 29(3) : 785-789. (In Chinese).

Google Scholar