Evaluating Goodness-of-Fit in Comparison of Different Expressions for Length-Weight Relationship in Fishery Resources

Article Preview

Abstract:

To find out the optimal length-weight relationship expression of fishery species, eight different expressions were used to fit the length-weight relationships in 18 fishery species (nine fish species, two shrimp species, three cephalopoda species, three crab species and one mantis shrimp species), including Linear Regression Function, Body Mass Index, Power Regression Function and Polynomial Function, and the goodness-of-fit of each expressions were compared by adjusted R-square, Residual Standard Deviation (RSD), and Fitting Optimization Index of Curve Regression which is proposed by Zhang. The results turned out that the polynomial equation W = a + b * L3 + c * L2 + d * L showed the best goodness-of-fit, while the linear equation W = a + b * L and BMI equation W = a * L2 showed the worst goodness-of-fit. Combined with prediction curve of regression function, there may be over-fitting in the model of polynomial function. In this research, the expressions W = a + b * Lc was proved to show the best goodness-of-fit in length-weight relationship at given simples or populations, and the constant term ‘a’ as an error may not be zero for samples.

You might also be interested in these eBooks

Info:

Periodical:

Pages:

337-343

Citation:

Online since:

September 2014

Export:

Price:

Permissions CCC:

Permissions PLS:

Сopyright:

© 2014 Trans Tech Publications Ltd. All Rights Reserved

Share:

Citation:

* - Corresponding Author

[1] X. H. Wang, F. Y. Du and Y. S. Qiu: Journal of Oceanography in Taiwan Strait. vol. 25(2006), P. 262-266.

Google Scholar

[2] H. L. Xu, D. X. Gu, X. T. Qiao and D. D. Cao: South China Fisheries Science. vol. 10(2014), P. 57-61.

Google Scholar

[3] L.O. Duarte, C.B. Garcia, N. Sandoval, D. von Schiller, G. Melo and P. Navajas: Naga, The World Fish Center. vol. 22(1999), P. 34-36.

Google Scholar

[4] A. H. Weatherley, H. S. Gill and J. M. Casselman: Academic Press (1987).

Google Scholar

[5] G. Petrakis and K. I. Stergiou: Fisheries Research. vol. 21(1995), P. 465–469.

Google Scholar

[6] Y. Y. Hua and J. R. Yuan: Acta Hydrobiologica Sinica. 8(1983), P. 45-61.

Google Scholar

[7] J. S. Huxley: Nature. 114(1924), P. 895-896.

Google Scholar

[8] R. J. Beverton and S. J. Holt: Springer (1993).

Google Scholar

[9] H. L. Xu, Y. Liu, D. X. Gu and X. T. Qiao. Fisheries Science. 33(2014), P. 142-146.

Google Scholar

[10] Information on http: /www. R-project. org.

Google Scholar

[11] Y. Chen, D. A. Jackson, and H. H. Harvey: Can J Fish Aquat Sci. vol. 49(1992). P. 1228-1235.

Google Scholar

[12] S. Q. Zhang: Chinese Journal of Health Statistics. vol. 19(2002), P. 9-11.

Google Scholar

[13] C. A. Kumolu-johnson and P. E. Ndimele: African Journal of Biotechnology. vol. 10(2011), P. 241-243.

Google Scholar

[14] K. B. Olurin and O. D. Savage: International Journal of Fisheries and Aquaculture. vol. 3(2011), P. 146-150.

Google Scholar

[15] M. Bosiljka and S. Gorenka: Periodicum Biologorum. vol. 112(2010), P. 133-138.

Google Scholar

[16] Y. Chen, L. X. Xu, X. J. Chen and X. J. Dai: Fisheries Research. vol. 85(2007), P. 14-22.

Google Scholar

[17] J. N. Pereira, A. Simas, A. Rosa, A. Aranha, S. Lino, E. Constantino, V. Monteiro, O. Tariche and G. Menezes: Journal of Applied Ichthyology. vol. 28(2012), P. 156-159.

DOI: 10.1111/j.1439-0426.2011.01915.x

Google Scholar

[18] C. A. Kumolu-johnson and P. E. Ndimele: Asian Journal of Agricultural Sciences. vol. 2(2010), P. 174-179.

Google Scholar