Influence of the Geometry on the Rolling Friction Torque in Lubricated Ball-Race Contacts

Article Preview

Abstract:

Based on a theoretical model and an experimental methodology for defining the friction torque in a modified thrust ball bearing having only 3 balls and presented in [2], the authors experimentally investigated the influence of the ball diameter on friction torque when operating in mixed and full film lubrication conditions and maintaining the normal load, the race curvature and oil viscosity constant. The experiments were realized using ball diameters between 7.938 mm and 3 mm corresponding to maximum Hertzian pressure between 0.264 GPa and 1 GPa and a rotational speed between 60 rpm to 240 rpm. The experiments confirmed that the measured friction torque can be explained using hydrodynamic rolling force relationships respecting the transition from IsoViscous Rigid (IVR) to ElastoHydrodynamic Lubrication (EHL) regime presented in [2].

You might also be interested in these eBooks

Info:

Periodical:

Pages:

271-276

Citation:

Online since:

October 2014

Export:

Price:

Permissions CCC:

Permissions PLS:

Сopyright:

© 2014 Trans Tech Publications Ltd. All Rights Reserved

Share:

Citation:

* - Corresponding Author

[1] D. Olaru, C. Stamate, A. Dumitrascu, G. Prisacaru, New micro tribometer for rolling friction, Wear 271 (2011) 842– 852.

DOI: 10.1016/j.wear.2011.03.007

Google Scholar

[2] M.R. Bălan, V.C. Stamate, L. Houpert, D. Olaru, The influence of the lubricant viscosity on the rolling friction torque, Tribology International 72 (2014) 1–12.

DOI: 10.1016/j.triboint.2013.11.017

Google Scholar

[3] L. Houpert, Piezoviscous–rigid rolling and sliding traction forces. Application: the rolling element–cage pocket contact, in: Proceedings of the 1986 ASLE/ASME Conference. Pittsburg, ASME Journal of Tribology vol. 109, (1987) 363–71.

DOI: 10.1115/1.3261367

Google Scholar

[4] N. Biboulet, L. Houpert, Hydrodynamic force and moment in pure rolling lubricated contacts: Part II, Point contacts, Proc. Inst. Mech. Eng, Part J, J. Eng. Tribol. 224 (2010)777–87.

DOI: 10.1243/13506501jet791

Google Scholar