The Study on Financial Management Assessment based on Analytical Hierarchy Process

Article Preview

Abstract:

Analytical hierarchy process method is proposed to assess financial management to realize the accurate financial management assessment in the paper. Analytic hierarchy process is a kind of hierarchical structure, which can estimate the impact of each index by determining the membership between up layer and bottom layer and gaining the weights of each index relative to assessment object. Assessment indexes of structural levels are established by analyzing the correlation of each index. Characteristic vector of the pairing comparison matrix which can be taken as the weights of assessment factors for financial management is established based on analytical hierarchy process. The weights provide a basis for rationality of finance management.

You might also be interested in these eBooks

Info:

Periodical:

Pages:

1786-1791

Citation:

Online since:

July 2011

Authors:

Export:

Price:

Permissions CCC:

Permissions PLS:

Сopyright:

© 2011 Trans Tech Publications Ltd. All Rights Reserved

Share:

Citation:

[1] Taqi N. Al-Faraj, Abdulaziz S. Alidi, Jamal A. Al-Zayer, Vendors selection via a spreadsheet analytical hierarchy process, Computers & Industrial Engineering, 1993, vol. 25, no. 1-4, pp.65-68.

DOI: 10.1016/0360-8352(93)90222-j

Google Scholar

[2] A. S. Meziani, F. Rezvani, Using the analytical hierarchy process to select a financing instrument for a foreign investment, Mathematical and Computer Modelling, 1990, vol. 13, no. 7, pp.77-82.

DOI: 10.1016/0895-7177(90)90130-f

Google Scholar

[3] Tzu-Chuan Chou, Shyi-Chyi Cheng, Design and implementation of a semantic image classification and retrieval of organizational memory information systems using analytical hierarchy process, Omega, 2006, vol. 34, no. 2, pp.125-134.

DOI: 10.1016/j.omega.2004.08.004

Google Scholar

[4] David L. Olson, Munirpallam Venkataramanan, John L. Mote, A technique using analytical hierarchy process in multiobjective planning models, Socio-Economic Planning Sciences, 1986, vol. 20, no. 6, pp.361-368.

DOI: 10.1016/0038-0121(86)90048-0

Google Scholar