The Performance of a Novel Solar Cooling and Power System with Different Working Fluids

Article Preview

Abstract:

Due to serious environmental problems and energy supply and demand issues, solar energy as a clean and abundant energy gets more and more attention. This paper presented a novel cooling and power system combined with PTCs. The system performance analysis was conducted with four different organic working fluids. The impacts of organic Rankine cycle (ORC) evaporation temperature, ORC condensing temperature and heat transfer fluid (HTF) mass flow rate in evaporator on system thermal performance were analyzed. The results show that system with toluene as working fluid has the highest thermal and exergy efficiency, and D4 and MDM have the lowest. Different working fluids have different cooling power to electricity ratios. The HTF mass flow rate in evaporator has a significant effect on system thermal performance.

You might also be interested in these eBooks

Info:

Periodical:

Pages:

86-93

Citation:

Online since:

October 2014

Export:

Price:

Permissions CCC:

Permissions PLS:

Сopyright:

© 2014 Trans Tech Publications Ltd. All Rights Reserved

Share:

Citation:

* - Corresponding Author

[1] Li, You-Rong, Jian-Ning Wang, and Mei-Tang Du. Energy. 2013 Vol. 42(1), p.503.

Google Scholar

[2] A. Fernández-García, E. Zarza,L. Valenzuela and M. Pérez. Renewable Sustainable Energy Rev. 2010 Vol. 14(7), p.1695.

Google Scholar

[3] Forristall R. Heat transfer analysis and modeling of a parabolic trough solar receiver implemented in engineering eqation solver. National Renewable Energy Laboratory (NREL); (2003).

DOI: 10.2172/15004820

Google Scholar

[4] Ricardo Vasquez Padilla, Armando Fontalvo, Gokmen Demirkaya, Arnold Martinez and Arturo Gonzalez Quiroga. Applied Thermal Engineering Vol. 67 (2014), p.579.

DOI: 10.1016/j.applthermaleng.2014.03.053

Google Scholar

[5] Liu Q B, Wang Y L, Gao Z C, Sui J, Jin H G and Li H P. Sci China Tech Sci Vol. 53 (2010), p.52.

Google Scholar

[6] B.F. Tchanche, Gr. Lambrinos, A. Frangoudakis and G. Papadakis, Applied Energy Vol. 87(2010), p.1295.

Google Scholar

[7] T. Chambers, J. Raush and B. russo, Energy Procedia Vol. 49(2014), p.1107.

Google Scholar

[8] O. Marc, F. Lucas, F. Sinama and E. Monceyron, Energy and Buildings Vol 42(2010), p.774.

Google Scholar

[9] C. Monné, S. Alonso, F. Palacín and J. Guallar, International Journal of Refrigeration Vol. 34(2011), p.518.

Google Scholar

[10] Zhang Xingjuan, Song Bojie, Bai Qingyuan and Yang Chunxin. Energy and Buildings Vol. 60(2013), p.280.

DOI: 10.1016/j.enbuild.2013.01.018

Google Scholar

[11] H. Zhai, Y.J. Dai, J.Y. Wu and R.Z. Wang, Applied Energy, Vol. 86(2009), p.1395.

Google Scholar

[12] R. Shankar and T. Srinivas, Procedia Engineering, Vol. 38(2012), p.730.

Google Scholar

[13] Fahad A. Al-Sulaiman, Ibrahim Dincer and Feridun Hamdullahpur, Solar Energy Vol. 85(2011), p.2228.

Google Scholar

[14] Fahad A. Al-Sulaiman, Feridun Hamdullahpur and Ibrahim Dincer, Renewable Energy Vol. 48(2012), p.161.

Google Scholar

[15] Drescher U, Bragemann D. Applied Thermal Engineering, 2006, Vol. 27 (1), p.223.

Google Scholar

[16] Hung T. Energy Conversion and Management 2001 Vol 42(5), p.539.

Google Scholar

[17] Richard Petela, Solar Energy Vol. 74(2003), p.469.

Google Scholar