An Optimization Design Method of Geometric Parameters of Skid Shoe Referring to Subject Weight of Marine Structures

Article Preview

Abstract:

The optimization design method of geometric parameters of skid shoe which is used to subject weight of marine structures is proposed. Considering skid shoe as steel frame structure, total weight and the bearing capacity of the skid shoe are selected as optimal objectives, and geometric parameters of the skid shoe are taken as design variables. Taking the strength, stiffness, local stability of the skid shoe as the constraint conditions, multi-objectives constraints optimization model of geometric parameters is established, and solved based on complex method. According to research results, a computer program has been developed using VC language. Then geometric optimum parameters of skid shoe in service of CNOOC are analyzed by the program. The results show that optimized design decreases steel volume, steel plate thickness by 28.7%, 18.4%, respectively, compared with original design. The optimization method has a series of advantages, such as simple model, fast calculating speed, high calculation accuracy.

You might also be interested in these eBooks

Info:

Periodical:

Pages:

325-332

Citation:

Online since:

October 2014

Export:

Price:

Permissions CCC:

Permissions PLS:

Сopyright:

© 2014 Trans Tech Publications Ltd. All Rights Reserved

Share:

Citation:

* - Corresponding Author

[1] Frangopol DM, Maute K. Reliability-based optimization of civil and aerospace systems. Engineering design reliability handbook. CRC Press; 2005. 24-1–24-32 [chapter 24].

DOI: 10.1201/9780203483930.ch24

Google Scholar

[2] Guo Jun, Xiao Xi, Zhu Jing. Multi-objective fuzzy optimization design of ocean engineering structure, ocean engineering [J] , 1994 , 12 (4) : 1~7.

Google Scholar

[3] Hu Yuda, The utility of multiple objective optimization, Shanghai: Shanghai science and Technology Press, (1990).

Google Scholar

[4] D. K. Despotis, J. Siskos.  Agricultural management using the ADELAIS multiobjective linear programming software: A case application[J]. Theory and Decision. 1992 (2).

DOI: 10.1007/bf00134047

Google Scholar

[5] Yang Y. Structural analysis and multidisciplinary design of flexible fluid loaded composite canard. Ph.D. thesis, Iowa State University; (2005).

DOI: 10.31274/rtd-180813-15409

Google Scholar

[6] Khan AM. Flexible composite propeller design using constrained optimization techniques. Ph.D. thesis, Iowa State University; (1997).

Google Scholar

[7] Friedmann PP, Venkatesan C, Yuan K. Development of a structural optimization capability for the aeroelastic tailoring of composite rotor blades with straight and swept tips. In: 4th AIAA symposium on multidisciplinary analysis and optimization, Cleveland, OH; (1992).

DOI: 10.2514/6.1992-4779

Google Scholar

[8] Ganguli R, Chopra I. Aeroelastic optimization of a composite helicopter rotor. In: 4th AIAA symposium on multidisciplinary analysis and optimization, Cleveland, OH; (1992).

DOI: 10.2514/6.1992-4780

Google Scholar

[9] Lee Y, Lin C. Optimized design of composite propeller. Mech Adv Mater Struct 2004; 11: 17–30.

Google Scholar

[10] Melchers RE. Structural reliability analysis and prediction. 2nd ed. Chichester (NY): John Wiley; (1999).

Google Scholar

[11] Rais-Rohani M, Singh MN. Comparison of global and local response surface techniques in reliability-based optimization of composite structures. Struct Multidiscip O 2004; 26: 333–45.

DOI: 10.1007/s00158-003-0353-0

Google Scholar

[12] China Classification Society. Rules for The Classification and Construction of Fixed Offshore Platforms[M], Beijing: China Communications Press, (1992).

Google Scholar

[13] Allen M, Maute K. Reliability-based shape optimization of structures undergoing fluid–structure interaction phenomena. Comput Method Appl M 2005; 194: 3472–95.

DOI: 10.1016/j.cma.2004.12.028

Google Scholar