Development of Droplets Penetrating Roots Performance Test Device and Tests Applied this Device in Ultrasonic Aeroponic System

Article Preview

Abstract:

Extremely flourishing roots of aeroponic plant lead droplets difficult to penetrate into the core of roots. This phenomenon is so-called “external is wet but internal is dry” and seriously affects areoponic efficiency, even result in aeroponic culture failure. In order to research droplets penetrating roots performance in ultrasonic aeroponic system, an intelligent test device was developed. This device included two ultrasonic nozzles whose working frequencies were 1.7MHz and 40kHz respectively, nozzles’ drive circuit, acquisition system of humidity and temperature based on ARM 9.0 and axial flow fan. The following conclusions were suggested: under the mature cherry tomatoes root system density cultured in aeroponic system, droplets generated by 1.7MHz ultrasonic atomizing nozzle were easier to penetrate into the core of the root; both size and concentration of droplets influenced droplets penetrating into the root; when 1.7MHz nozzle was used to atomization, the best penetrating condition was found in supply air rate 0.021and spray volume 0.4L/h; for 40kHz atomizing nozzle , the best penetrating condition was found in supply air rate 0.021and spray volume 1.2L/h; for 1.7MHz nozzle the worst work conditions of penetrating into the root were that supply air rate was 0.014and spray volume was 0.8L/h and for 40kHz nozzle that was supply air rate 0.033and spray volume 1.2L/h.

You might also be interested in these eBooks

Info:

Periodical:

Pages:

288-291

Citation:

Online since:

October 2014

Export:

Price:

Permissions CCC:

Permissions PLS:

Сopyright:

© 2014 Trans Tech Publications Ltd. All Rights Reserved

Share:

Citation:

* - Corresponding Author

[1] J.M. Gao, G.Z. Huang, W.C. Yin, et al. Variation of root-zone droplet deposition, temperature and humidity of truss ultrasonic atomization cultivator[J]. Transaction of the Chinese Society of Agricultural Engineering(Transaction of the CSAE). 29 (2013).

Google Scholar

[2] E. Ritter , B. Angulo , P. Riga , et al. Comparison of hydroponic and aeroponic cultivation systems on the production in potato minitubers[J].Potato Research. 44 (2001), p.127-135.

DOI: 10.1007/bf02410099

Google Scholar

[3] H. A. Kratseh, W. R. Graves , R. J. Gladon. Aeroponic system for control of root-zone atmosphere [J]. Environmental and Experimental Botany. 55 (2006), p.70-76.

DOI: 10.1016/j.envexpbot.2004.10.002

Google Scholar

[4] A. L. Hayden. Aeroponic and hydroponic systems for medicinal herb, rhizome, and root crop[J]. HortScience. 41 (2006), p.536-538.

DOI: 10.21273/hortsci.41.3.536

Google Scholar

[5] R. Kamies, M. S. Rafudeen, J. Farrant. The use of aeroponics to investigate antioxidant activity in the roots of Xerophyta viscosa [J]. Plant Growth Regulation. 62 (2010), p.203-211.

DOI: 10.1007/s10725-010-9498-1

Google Scholar

[6] Q.X. He, J.C. Wang, D.B. Tang, et al. Increasing minituber production in aeroponic culture[J]. Chinese Potato Journal. 17 (2003), p.70-73. (in Chinese).

Google Scholar

[7] W.Z. Xu, L.B. Wang, X.F. Zhang, et al. Review on aeroponics: a new cultivation pattern[J]. Guangdong Agricultural Sciences. 7 (2006), p.30-33. (in Chinese).

Google Scholar

[8] X.X. Sun. Recent research advance of ultrasonic atomizer[J]. Industrial Furnace. 26 (2004), p.19-23. (in Chinese).

Google Scholar

[9] W.X. Huang, J.M. Gao, C.Y. Chen. Present situations and prospects of ultrasonic atomization application[J]. Journal of Agricultural Mechanization Research. (2007), p.154-158. (in Chinese).

Google Scholar

[10] J.M. Gao, N. Ren, F. Gu, et al. Optimum design and experiment on low-frequency ultrasonic atomizing nozzles[J]. Journal of jiangsu university. 30 (2009), p.1-4. (in Chinese).

Google Scholar

[11] N. Ren, J.M. Gao. Numerical simulation of impedance characteristic of low-frequency ultrasonic nozzle for aeroponic culture[J] . Transaction of the Chinese Society of Agricultural Engineering (Transactions of the CSAE). (2009), p.115-118.

Google Scholar

[12] A. Mohammand, A.G. Khan, C. Kuek. Improved aeroponic culture of inocula of arbular mycorrhizal fungi [J].Mycorrhiza. 9(2000), p.337-339.

DOI: 10.1007/s005720050278

Google Scholar

[13] D. Raring, W.A. Vancouver. Aeroponic growing apparatus and method[P]. US Patent. (2011).

Google Scholar