Selection of the Optimal Alternative of the Deposit Opening Applying the Decision-Making Process

Abstract:

The reason for opening deeper mining horizon is to preserve the volume of extraction, a smooth transition to a new horizon with the intention of mining state of existing stocks. In the proposal of opening will be maintain the current direction of transport (extraction of mineral, haulage of materials, lower) through bank to the existing plant equipment. Alternative proposals for solutions of opening new horizon will be limited to the range of main opening workings (hoisting shaft), including relevant hoisting equipment and objects immediately fasten on it. Other deeper horizon equipment outside the pumping station (filling station, transformer station, depot, level gangway, etc.) will be practically independent on the horizon and will be the same essentially in all cases. The proposal will be considered three alternatives: deepening of a shaft, sinking blind shaft and dip road. The best alternative will be recommended on the basis of the decision-making process.

• Periodical: Applied Mechanics and Materials (Volume 683)
• Pages: 196-201
• DOI: https://doi.org/10.4028/www.scientific.net/AMM.683.196
• Online since: October 2014
• Authors: Daniela Marasová*, Stanislav Lukáč, Ľubomír Ambriško, Michal Cehlár
• Keywords: Decision-Making, Deposit Opening, Mining

References

[1] STN 73 7501: 1993, Designing of structures of tunnelled underground objects. Common provisions. (original in Slovak).

[2] M. Cehlár, E. Jacek, J. Mihok, R. Rybár, Surface Mining, F BERG, Košice, (2006).

[3] M. Ataei, M. Jamshidi, F. Sereshki, S.M.E. Jalali, Mining method selection by multiple criteria decision making tools, J. S. Afr. I. Min. Metall. 108(12) (2008) 741-749.

[4] J. Šaderová, Application example of multi-criteria evaluation for selection of the transport system, Acta Logistica Moravica 3(2) (2013) 86-93.

[5] M. Andrejiova, A. Pavliskova, N. Husakova, Application of multi-criterion decision methods by the selection of optimal constructive elements for devices of continuous transport, in: Carpathian Logistics Congress, Czech Republic, 2012: pp.1-6.

[6] M. Andrejiová, M. Piňosová, E. Lumitzer, M. Moravec, Application of the AHP method in identification of weights of impact of factors on the working environment quality, Physical factors of the environment 2 (2012) 103-106. (original in Slovak).

[7] M. Andrejiova, Z. Kimakova, D. Marasova, Using AHP method at the determination of the optimal selection ctriteria of conveyor belts, Ann. Fac. Eng. Hunedoara 11(2) (2013) 155-160.

[8] M. Straka, Distribution logistics in examples, F BERG, Košice, 2012. (original in Slovak).

[9] I. Rohacova, Z. Markova, The Analysis of AHP method and its potential use in logistics, Acta Montanistica Slovaca 14(1) (2009) 103-112.

[10] T.L. Saaty, How to make a decision: The Analytic Hierarchy Process, Interfaces 6 (1994) 19-43.

DOI: 10.1287/inte.24.6.19

[11] Mine construction JSC Prievidza, Opening of the Manó-Gabriela deposit under the staple shaft XII, Summary Technical Report, stage I of the project, No 16. 0-333, 1997. (original in Slovak).